View Single Post
Old 02-10-2013, 03:41 PM   #27
The_Order
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goosehead View Post
federer was 2 points from the title..being that close to winning wimbledon and losing would hurt (even if he did win 5 times already)..if he didnt care he wouldnt be the champion he is..

also we know always has one eye on tennis history, so being 2 points away from a record breaking 6 in a row at wimbledon would also gnaw away at him. (*renshaw won 6 in a row in 1880s when the title holder only had to play in the final the next year so it dosnt really count but we have to mention it )
So does this mean Decugis' 8 French titles don't count since only French players could play when he won his titles?
__________________
helloworld - "If Nadal wants to surpass Pete, he will need 34 slams, twice more than Federer to be in the same conversation with Sampras."
The_Order is offline   Reply With Quote