View Single Post
Old 02-11-2013, 03:44 PM   #36
THUNDERVOLLEY
Legend
 
THUNDERVOLLEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmnk View Post
ok, let's play a trivia game:

Who is a better player (I've modified the stats to make players more anonymous :

player A; win/loss 380-192 (66%), titles 15, highest ranking; top 3, no slam win, 5 master titles

player B: win/loss 415-247 (63%), titles 10, highest ranking: top 3, one slam win, 1 master title

player C: win/loss 500-250 (66%), titles 19, highest ranking: top 5, no slam, 1 master title

player D: win/loss 360-292 (55%), titles 9, highest ranking inside top 10, one slam win, 1 master title

could you rank them?
You are dancing around your original point:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmnk View Post
yap, because wining a slam truly cements one's legacy. As proven by:

Myskina
Schiavone
Majoli

Are you suggesting that these players are/were better than Wozniacki?
That was your point--centering on the major-less Wozniacki based on stats which are meaningless compared to the main reason to play pro tennis.

Any player failing to do that is wasting their time.
THUNDERVOLLEY is offline   Reply With Quote