View Single Post
Old 02-18-2013, 06:55 PM   #39
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Birmingham, AL U.S.A.
Posts: 658

Originally Posted by big ted View Post
i dont see how anyone would think a 14time gs champion and 6time #1 player who retired only 10 years ago wouldnt be fine today if he were in his prime against the current crop
The game has changed significantly in terms of athleticism, style, technique, and tactics from when he was on top in the mid to late 1990's. This has been echoed by most of the peers of his generation (Agassi, Rafter, Chang, Martin).

A lot of the aggressiveness and gameplan that made him #1 would not be rewarded by the evolution of the game, and he showed little ability during his career to adapt to the kind of play he'd have to excel in to compete at the top. Compared to what the elite players bring to the court now, it seems that he would fall a little short
droliver is offline   Reply With Quote