Originally Posted by Clemson_tennis
I'm not sure what you are trying to say Clark. I am posting results than back up the OP's point that several unranked d1 schools are quality.
The original point is not disputed by anyone, so why belabor it? Only 75 schools get ranked, and #100 would be a darn good team by D-III standards. No argument from anyone there.
However, ignorami continue to post generalizations like "D-I tennis is where it's at" and "Any D-I team would be favored over a D-III team." That seems to be the only point still disputed. When that is settled, the whole stupid thread can be put to rest.