Thread: weeks at No. 1
View Single Post
Old 02-21-2013, 08:08 AM   #43
Hall Of Fame
Goosehead's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: A bloke in Brighton, England.
Posts: 3,403

Originally Posted by McLovin View Post
No, it isn't as simple as that. In today's ranking system, the four majors are given 2000 points, then you have the Masters 1000s, then the 500s, then the 250s.

Back in 1990, Lendl received 452 points for winning the AO, but Edberg received 536 for Wimbledon in the same year, 379 for winning Masters Cincy, and 411 for winning Masters Paris.

So, the point totals are not uniform and therefore ranking results and major winners from the past cannot be used to compare against similar achievements today. The numbers have no correlation with how many majors someone has or hasn't won.
why were there unequal points for winners of different majors
All we are give Geese a chance.
Goosehead is offline   Reply With Quote