Originally Posted by tenniscasey
You shouldn't be calling other people dumb. "It adds a pointless complication" (which I said) is not the same thing as "it is complicated" (which nobody here has said; Coman isn't complicated in isolation, it becomes a complication when you add it to the existing rule system that everyone naturally uses).
The guy who insists on using Coman is one of my singles opponents. At least you and I can agree that Coman is useless in singles.
I'm sorry- if you think that changing after 4 points rather thatn 6 points is a complication then I think that a box of rocks is smarter than you.
You can complain about too many changeovers. You can complain that there is no good reason to do the coman tiebreak for singles. But if you complain that the coman tiebreak is an added complication then I don't understand how you can tie your shoes by yourself and velcro is likely the greatest thing that has ever happened to you.