View Single Post
Old 02-27-2013, 05:53 PM   #56
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,831

Originally Posted by tennispro492 View Post
Most of you so far seem to have missed one vital fact- as i posted in my first post, ferrer has leading head to heads against all of those guys, thus he is better than them.
You mean, like, BP has a winning head to head against Fed, thus he is better than him? Sorry, head to head is a useful tiebreaker, but it's not the end all and BE all. If you ask most pros if they would be ranked consistently high for most of a career, but never even reach a Slam final, let alone win one, or be up and down but have a US Open, I suspect a majority of them would take the title.

Last edited by dafinch; 02-27-2013 at 05:58 PM.
dafinch is offline   Reply With Quote