Originally Posted by tennispro492
Most of you so far seem to have missed one vital fact- as i posted in my first post, ferrer has leading head to heads against all of those guys, thus he is better than them.
You mean, like, BP has a winning head to head against Fed, thus he is better than him? Sorry, head to head is a useful tiebreaker, but it's not the end all and BE all. If you ask most pros if they would be ranked consistently high for most of a career, but never even reach a Slam final, let alone win one, or be up and down but have a US Open, I suspect a majority of them would take the title.