Originally Posted by Nickzor
Maybe write in a way that's comprehend-able so i can reply
In your post you said two things:
1) that Fed is well past his prime, which imply that beating him three time in a row is nothing special.
2) that Fed is well past his prime but still able to beat Novak in RG which shows how great a player he still is.
I see a contradiction. I think it was a great feat from Novak to beat Fed three time in a row, even if I agree Fed in 2011 is not the same player than until 2009.
Is my english good enough for you?