Originally Posted by Flash O'Groove
In your post you said two things:
1) that Fed is well past his prime, which imply that beating him three time in a row is nothing special.
2) that Fed is well past his prime but still able to beat Novak in RG which shows how great a player he still is.
I see a contradiction. I think it was a great feat from Novak to beat Fed three time in a row, even if I agree Fed in 2011 is not the same player than until 2009.
Is my english good enough for you?
Okay gotcha! Yes I agree with all of that, I just couldn't quite understand what you meant before, lol sorry