Originally Posted by forzamilan90
I'd see you argument if the guy won more, but he's got more losses in pro major finals than wins (couting pro majors too see wikipedia, 1-7). he's 4-2 in the not pro majors. How I am supposed to believe the hype for this guy with these kind of stats?
"Pro Majors"? The Wikipedia article is a little strange on this.
There were two tournament championships, in 1958 and 1959. Each tournament in the series had points for finishing, to divide the bonus money pool at season's end.
Neither series involved the Cleveland (an unaccredited title) or Wembley events, which were not under Kramer management.
The Cleveland had a weak field (the Australian Pro had a much stronger field) and the Wembley was won by Anderson in 1959.