View Single Post
Old 03-17-2013, 08:46 AM   #30
hoodjem's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 12,240

Originally Posted by TMF View Post
You guys act like you know everything and the rest of the world know nothing just because you disagree. Steve Flink doesn't even include Pancho on his list:

1. Federer
2. Sampras
3. Laver
4. Kramer
5. Tilden

I'm sure you all will say he doesn't know anything about tennis history while Bobby say Rosewall, Dan say Hoad, Borg Number say Borg, hoodlum say Laver...are all experts in here and no one knows better. Too funny.
Is Steve Flink the noted sports psychologist? I wonder where he places Gonzales? IMO, his is a strange list. I would not say that he knows nothing about tennis; I would say that his placement of Sampras and Kramer is too high, IMO.
Is there a link to his entire list?

Sorry, just because I agree with Mustard and disagree with Flink means that I disagree with Flink--not that I believe he knows nothing. Your statement quoted here says more about the way you perceive disagreement than it says anything else.
In the end, the aggressive all-court player always has the advantage against a power-bashing baseliner.

Last edited by hoodjem : 03-17-2013 at 09:00 AM.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote