Originally Posted by Mustard
Mary Carillo once said on air that Sampras had never even heard of Gonzales, because Gonzales had not won Wimbledon, nor been in a Wimbledon final. When this was put to Gonzales' one-time brother-in-law, Agassi, Agassi said that he wasn't surprised, because tennis history is extremely complicated, and if you don't look closely enough, a lot of its history will be missed.
Why bring up Sampras since he's not a historian? I was referring to the respected people like Flink, Wertheim, Collins, or Drucker who are well known for their tennis knowledge and would never criticize their opinion.