Originally Posted by BobbyOne
ARFED, It's not a case of convenient or not. It's just a fact that Laver and Rosewall played mostly with wood racquets. Wood was used much longer than poly as you know. Wood shows who really is a genius. With poly one can easier show fine shots even when not being that skilled...
With wood not only Nadal would lose some of his strength but also GOAT Federer would lose some of his skills. So I think Nadal would again have the edge against Roger.
Bud Collins is often asked if Federer is the GOAT (he ranks him among the top five). He uses to answer: "He can't beat Nadal"...
Austrian expert, i`ve heard Bud Collins more than once saying that Fed is the greatest player of the Open era, so i think that he ranks him pretty high. And again you just showed that the first time you picked up a racqet was 2 weeks ago, when you throw some of them accidentally on the floor in a store.
Seroiusly Bobby, seriously???? Nadal would have the upper hand against Federer with a wood racquet???
You know that the truth is not in the books, it is out there. Go, play some tennis, feel the emotion, and then comeback and we can discuss.