View Single Post
Old 03-30-2013, 10:32 AM   #1185
hoodjem's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 11,855

Originally Posted by hoodjem View Post
I don't know.

If the computer ranking system is properly and fairly configured, and the total points add up to player X being the winner (without any slams or with lesser slams), then there should be only one outcome--not multiple, differing interpretations.
Originally Posted by Xavier G View Post
It's not strictly necessary to be a Slam Winner, but personally I would always prefer to give a year's top position to a player who's won at least one of the Big Four.
In that case, many of us are guilty of "Slam Bias."
The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are aggressively certain, while the intelligent are full of doubt.

Last edited by hoodjem : 03-30-2013 at 10:37 AM.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote