Originally Posted by HunterST
I keep proving it with every post, huh? That's weird, because that was the very first post I made about the topic.
Everyone gets it, man. Bo Jackson was a freak athlete. Still, when you define athlete as "skill in a sport" it's ridiculous to say that the most accomplished tennis player of all time can't compare. It would be like saying someone was a way better athlete than Michael Jordan. Maybe they could run faster/bench press 220 for more reps, etc. but can you really say they were, without a shadow of a doubt, more skilled than the consensus best of all time? No.
You keep calling everyone ignorant, but, really, it's just a matter of you refusing to look at the issue from any point of view that differs slightly from how you first interpreted it.
Clearly, you watched "You Don't Know Bo," were super impressed, and now don't want to listen to anyone else's viewpoints.
Think whatever you want but you should research a little more before you talk about the voted greatest athlete ever, because obviously you did not know anything about him. But you are so in love with fed that is all you need, because when you try to compare fed to bo athletically it is ridiculous.