Originally Posted by Feather
Trust me, it was a typo.
I know it was 2001. This is what I meant to say. Roger beat Pete in 2001. I know it was the fourth round. What I meant is prior to 2001, he has never won a match at Wimbledon. He lost twice in first round and lost again in first round in 2002.
Okay, not a problem.
Step 1: Refute content of argument. If that fails, Step 2: question intelligence of the author. If that fails, Step 3: demonize the messenger.