Originally Posted by Feather
Every player who played the game will have easy draws and tough draws. At the end of career, it all evens out. It's very childish to select one major and say that his opposition was weak and it should be omitted. It's like a teen age guy who cribs that my favorite player lost because he was injured!
Roger Federer also had some relatively tough draws. So if a major should be omitted because it's relatively easy so should he be awarded two majors for a relatively tough draw?
Feather, absurd and nasty...
Edit: I apologize for these words.