View Single Post
Old 04-23-2013, 04:12 PM   #100
TMF
Talk Tennis Guru
 
TMF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,210
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY View Post
You are obsessing on Serena again.

What is the lone criteria for GOAT for decades? Said at the time when players such as Court, Graf and Laver won, it is winning the Grand Slam, not irrelevant, random stats (ex. weeks at #1, finals appearances, etc.), which some use to pad the sheet of players never talented/dominant enough to win the Grand Slam.

Figure it out, junior.
Goat criteria is based on player's entire achievement, and that is coming from every experts/historians/ex-players(eg TTC). However that is too much for simple minded like you to understand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY View Post
No Grand Slam. No GOAT.
Quote:
Originally Posted by THUNDERVOLLEY View Post
But that's not too much of a surprise, since Federer failed to win the Grand Slam, so he's no GOAT in the sport, either.
by your own admission...Court > Serena.
__________________
Federer > Davydenko > Nadal > Federer
Nadalgaenger: "Djokovic is clearly better than Pete"
TMF is offline   Reply With Quote