View Single Post
Old 04-25-2013, 08:57 AM   #20
Cup8489
Legend
 
Cup8489's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Silvis, IL
Posts: 8,857
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
Sampras would be better than Federer on 90s style grass without question, and Federer would have alot of strong competition there besides Pete. So probably only 1 or 2 Wimbledons vs the 7 he has now.

U.S Open would be between him and Pete with some other contenders. Maybe 2 or 3 there.

Australian Open he would have alot of competition from Agassi. Probably 2 or 3 titles there.

French there was a ton more depth on clay then but no clay courters near Nadals level (but many of them around Federers level which is obviously light years below Nadals) so 1 or 2 titles there.

On average probably something like 8 vs the 16 he has now.
LOL.

You don't watch tennis. Never have.
__________________
"And what if there IS a difference? The fact is I heard a difference, regardless if there actually is a difference or not."
Cup8489 is offline   Reply With Quote