View Single Post
Old 05-02-2013, 01:39 PM   #1472
Gut4Tennis
Hall Of Fame
 
Gut4Tennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tennis Court
Posts: 1,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluetrain4 View Post
I completely agree that UVA should have been seeded No. 1 and are the best team. But, the ITA computers actually aren't that crazy, IMO. We all know the formula. UCLA is No. 1 because their resume of wins/losses is, based on that formula, better than UVA's. It's really not a judgment of UCLA being better than UVA, it's just the inevitable result of adding up the numbers.

What's a joke is that the selection committee doesn't use the rankings as a guide and generally follow them, but then make common-sense adjustments as necessary. But, then you'd have people harping about the committee's subjective bias.

Regardless, it all sort of worked out brilliantly for UVA with UCLA, USC, OSU on the opposite half.
exactly!!!

also when uva was ranked #1 they had the curse, but now at #2 they have less pressure IMO
Gut4Tennis is offline   Reply With Quote