Thread: connors bio
View Single Post
Old 05-13-2013, 07:44 AM   #97
TheCanadian's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 476

Originally Posted by heftylefty View Post
This is one of those "Life is not Fair" examples. Connors' or any man can't get pregnant, thus have no say in regarding a woman's body or her choices. If Evert felt the need to keep this matter private; I would imagine that a decent human being would honor that. But no one is accusing Connors of being decent.

In the interest of full disclosure, I am not a Chris Evert fan.
Yes, somehow resorting to an abortion because the timing was professionally inconvenient without giving the father of said baby a say in the matter makes Evert a decent human being, right? But when Connors talks about it in his biography, that makes him an indecent human being, right?

I find this type of "morality" somewhat suspect.

There's a conflict of interest between the baby and the mother. Someone recently joked that if babies in the womb had guns, there would be far less abortions.
TheCanadian is offline   Reply With Quote