Originally Posted by Top Jimmy
Lets see Fed at 35 play the world #1 in the US Open final and see if he wins a set and up a break in the 3rd.
And in theory, if 2005 was a weak era, then Fed won those titles in a weak era. If not, Agassi at the end of his career was getting to finals at 35 years of age against better competition which means his era must have been ridiculous.
Look at the head to head between Agassi and Federer after Federer reached his peak. Federer completely dominated Agassi and barely lost any sets. If Federer was 35 and played the #1 player 8 times, there is a good chance he might be able to challenge him in one of those matches.