Originally Posted by Top Jimmy
Lets see Fed at 35 play the world #1 in the US Open final and see if he wins a set and up a break in the 3rd.
And in theory, if 2005 was a weak era, then Fed won those titles in a weak era. If not, Agassi at the end of his career was getting to finals at 35 years of age against better competition which means his era must have been ridiculous.
So, you're looking at the twilight of their respective careers to determine their greatness? LOL
And don't worry at 30 RFederer already won a slam beating the #1 and #4 seeds back-to-back.