Originally Posted by abmk
roddick was a more dangerous player than chang, by far and won a slam in a full field , unlike tanner.
hewitt's far better than both of them and its not even close.
Tanner beat Vilas and Roddick beat Ferrero.up to you...
Hewitt, at most, has one fully credible win, over Sampras at the US Open.His Wimbledon final against Nalbandian is, more or less, as " great" a win as Mac beating Lewis in the same event, in 83.
Stolle won two majors, beating all time greats Newcombe (USO) and Roche (FO).Like Roddick, he also lost three Wimbledon finals.