Originally Posted by 6-1 6-3 6-0
People just seem to assume that Djokovic would have beaten Nadal in 2011 at Roland Garros. In the early stages of 2013 Roland Garros, Nadal was vulnerable, just like in the early rounds of 2011, and had been straight-setted by Djokovic in Monte Carlo (so there are already some parallels to be drawn between 2011 and 2013). Yet Nadal STILL got into a position to serve for the match in four sets, and then ended up winning it in five. If 2011 Djokovic played Nadal, it would have probably have been a bit closer than 2013, with Nadal still getting the win.
How much closer than a 9-7 5th set can it get? You mean like 7-6 6-7 7-6 6-7 20-18?