View Single Post
Old 10-15-2013, 02:36 PM   #33
NatF's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 11,629

Originally Posted by hoodjem View Post
Nothing against Agassi in particular, but in general, I believe that the career slam is the silliest, emptiest, and most vapid accolade in all of tennis "honors".

It is a recent creation of brainless, shallow journalistic hype.

It and two dollars might buy you a cup of coffee.
I think winning on all surfaces is important. It's the Golden Career Slam I think it's moronic. All it means is that player won 5 best of 3 set matchs and a 5 set final on hards (or grass), there's nothing unique about the format. It's obviously inferior to a slam win, means next to nothing in comparison.
NatF is online now   Reply With Quote