View Single Post
Old 10-16-2013, 06:38 AM   #42
hoodjem's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 12,240

Originally Posted by NatF View Post
I think winning on all surfaces is important. It's the Golden Career Slam I think it's moronic. All it means is that player won 5 best of 3 set matchs and a 5 set final on hards (or grass), there's nothing unique about the format. It's obviously inferior to a slam win, means next to nothing in comparison.
If Agassi had won all his slams on four surfaces in one year, then it would be truly great.

But to take 8 years to do it, rather dilutes any claim to greatness.
In the end, the aggressive all-court player always has the advantage against a power-bashing baseliner.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote