View Single Post
Old 10-16-2013, 06:38 AM   #42
hoodjem's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 12,409

Originally Posted by NatF View Post
I think winning on all surfaces is important. It's the Golden Career Slam I think it's moronic. All it means is that player won 5 best of 3 set matchs and a 5 set final on hards (or grass), there's nothing unique about the format. It's obviously inferior to a slam win, means next to nothing in comparison.
If Agassi had won all his slams on four surfaces in one year, then it would be truly great.

But to take 8 years to do it, rather dilutes any claim to greatness.
Step 1: Refute content of argument. If that fails, Step 2: question intelligence of the author. If that fails, Step 3: demonize the messenger.
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote