View Single Post
Old 10-16-2013, 07:38 AM   #42
hoodjem
G.O.A.T.
 
hoodjem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bierlandt
Posts: 12,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NatF View Post
I think winning on all surfaces is important. It's the Golden Career Slam I think it's moronic. All it means is that player won 5 best of 3 set matchs and a 5 set final on hards (or grass), there's nothing unique about the format. It's obviously inferior to a slam win, means next to nothing in comparison.
If Agassi had won all his slams on four surfaces in one year, then it would be truly great.

But to take 8 years to do it, rather dilutes any claim to greatness.
__________________
"Capitalist industry offers the freedom to choose what is always the same."
hoodjem is offline   Reply With Quote