Originally Posted by NatF
I think winning on all surfaces is important. It's the Golden Career Slam I think it's moronic. All it means is that player won 5 best of 3 set matchs and a 5 set final on hards (or grass), there's nothing unique about the format. It's obviously inferior to a slam win, means next to nothing in comparison.
If Agassi had won all his slams on four surfaces in one year, then it would be truly great.
But to take 8 years to do it, rather dilutes any claim to greatness.