Originally Posted by drm025
Maybe that's why people rate him higher, but why is that so important? Because tennis used to be played on mostly grass? What does that have to do with today's game? In today's game grass has the least representation on the tour, and either way all the top players play all the slams. They are all worth the same TODAY.
Lendl without Wimbledon put him down even further against Borg. Ever notice Mac, Connor, Agassi are place above Lendl despite he a better career than them? They all won Wimbledon.