|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Score: 2-6, 7-6 (1), 6-4, 7-6 (1)
(44 games) Agassi was the top seed, Becker #3. Becker had 22 aces (three on second serve) and 10 double-faults. Agassi had 4 aces and 6 df's. Becker's aces by set: 4, 4, 7, 7 Agassi's aces by set: 3, 1, 0, 0 Agassi did not serve an ace after the second game of the second set, no doubt because he needed to get his first serve in. Becker was taking Agassi’s second serve and charging, even early in the match. By 2-3 in the third he’d won 11 of 17 approaches that way (per NBC stats). Becker made 49 clean winners: 11 FH, 6 BH, 14 FHV, 10 BHV, 8 smashes. Agassi made 49 clean winners: 23 FH, 18 BH, 6 FHV, 0 BHV, and 2 smashes. Becker’s winners by set: 8, 15, 5, 21 Agassi’s winners by set: 9, 12, 9, 19 Agassi’s two volley winners in the second set were unconventional: both were hit from behind the service line; one was a lob over Becker’s head, the other a swinging forehand volley. His next volley winner was also a swinging forehand. He didn’t have a conventional volley winner until the fourth set. Of course, the majority of the volleys he hit were conventional; but to put them away, at least before the fourth set, he needed to swing at the ball. And he never managed a backhand volley winner of any kind. Agassi’s winners at the net were similar to his count in his Davis Cup match with Becker six years earlier, in which I counted 7 volley winners from him. By contrast, I saw him hit over 20 volley winners in his 1988 loss to Wilander on red clay at Roland Garros. In the '95 match, Becker got more winners from volleys/smashes than he did from ground strokes (32 to 17). Becker made two winning BH returns of Agassi’s second serve, and two FH returns of Agassi’s first serve. None were passes, but he did make three passing shots (including two lobs). Agassi made 14 service return winners (half of them off Becker’s first serve); thirteen were passes. He made 15 other passing shots, not including his volley lob winner: 8 BH’s (one lob) and 7 FH’s. In the early and middle stages of the match, Becker was staying back on some second serves, and at least once on a first serve. The fourth set was hard-fought, with both men holding serve throughout, fighting through long games and many break points (Agassi was 0-6, Becker 0-7). And there were 40 winners between them, a new high in the matches that I’ve looked at, exceeding the 39 that Becker and Agassi themselves hit in the third set of their Davis Cup match. Last edited by krosero : 04-03-2009 at 08:02 PM. Reason: added return passes, aces on 2nd serve; made slight corrections on winners, df's |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rookie
|
Your analysis are always very interesting. But why don't you scout serve winners too?
c. |
|
|
|
| Nickognito |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nickognito |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
Do you know of a good definition of a service winner that everyone agrees on? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rookie
|
I don't good any good definition of nothing that everyone agrees on
I think a service is a winner when the other player cannot return. Just touches the ball. c. |
|
|
|
| Nickognito |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nickognito |
|
|
#5 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 86
|
nice stats krosero
I remeber this being a classic semi-final match - a great performance by Becker agaisnt a very strong Agassi at the time. The way I remember it (though it is a long time ago now) Agassi was running away with this match playing "in the zone" but apparently within himself - beating Boris's serve and volley tactics very effectively. It looked like Becker had no chance. Then Boris had what i like to call an "episode" (much screaming at himself in german) before completely changing tactics and playing Andre from the baseline - at his own game - so to speak...and started beating him at it too! This complete change seemed to really phase Andre while Boris's confidence grew and he went on to win from there. Both played really well at times but mentally Boris "the tank" got the edge in the 2nd set ...and didnt loose it. Didn't work against Sampras in the final though... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
But I didn't really see a change in tactics, and the stats don't confirm it. Only in the first set does he have more ground stroke winners than volleys/smashes: 4 vs. 3. In the second it was 6 vs. 9, in the third 2 vs. 3, and in the fourth 5 vs. 16. By then he was clearly at his most aggressive. Last edited by krosero : 12-13-2007 at 10:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 22
|
I'm not sure that I remember this match too well (as an Agassi fan, it's too painful to go back and watch), but I also do not remember a change in tactics by Becker...in retrospect, the famous baseline-to-baseline forehand winner really stands out as the turning point
what I do remember was that, coming in to the match, Becker had to go to 9-7 in the fifth to beat Pioline in the quarters - no shame in that, but Agassi was looking so strong that I felt Agassi would likely win in straight sets (remember, Agassi owned Becker at that point) and it certainly looked like Agassi was on his way to an easy victory early on - as i recall, he played about as well as I ever saw him play up to 4-1 in the second set...then, Becker played a good game to break him, and Andre was never the same...his passing shots (which had been razor sharp) were sitting up for Becker to put away...by early in the third set (or maybe earlier), Agassi's eyes had that "deer in the headlights" look, while Becker was walking like he owned wimbledon (that's how I remember it...but my bias is obviously slanted towards Agassi) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
Seriously, it's ironic being a Becker fan, that I didn't bother to watch this match because I expected Agassi to win; and I was not that into tennis anymore. Becker's win revived my interest for bit; and then Agassi's rivalry with Sampras got me just as interested as everyone ... until Andre went away. But it's ironic that I saw all of Andre's victories over Boris in Slams -- including the 95 USO, which I sat down hopefully to watch -- but I have not seen the one that Becker took, until now. It's hard to pinpoint exactly how the match got turned around. Sometimes a single moment can have great impact, and that first break seems to have been a psychological turning point; until then I think that mentally, Agassi's 8 straight victories were still on the minds of both men; after that it just became a dogfight. Agassi was in the zone through 4-1 in the second, no question. He'd had a non-taxing QF and was having a great year. Becker was still stiff from the Pioline quarterfinal (something McEnroe noted too). I think it took him a while to get on fire; that baseline rally that got him the break point at 1-4 amazed me, the way he was moving then, with so much vigor despite getting spanked. But I'm a fan, so that's my bias. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Rookie
|
one of the most incredible match i've ever seen. Agassi was dominating, Becker was humiliated, but Boris pride was too big. It wasn't a match of tennis, it was some kind of magic. Agassi was hopeless, because that day he needed more than his tennis,
And it was a wonderful day. Sampras was already in the final, but Ivanisevic played one of the best match ever on grass, maybe the best ever (with the exception of a dozen crucial points bad played, obviously). The tennis winners were Ivanisevic and Agassi, clearly. But the brain, and the pride, were more important that day. Great great day of tennis. c. |
|
|
|
| Nickognito |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Nickognito |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,470
|
Quote:
Many talk about Agassi going into a tailspin after losing the '95 US final to Sampras, but they should mention this one as well, blowing a 6-2,4-1(2 breaks!) lead in a Wimbledon SF? How demoralizing to play well enough to win 3 majors in one year & yet only walk away with one. Agassi is the greater player, but Becker was mentally tougher. I remember being in awe of Agassi that event, I had never seen anyone return serve like that on grass before (even when he won it in '92) you almost expected him to hit a winner on every return(I think the NY Times had a writer describe how well Agassi was playing prior to SF day, "maybe if they have Agassi return Sampras, Becker, & Goran's serves at the same time, they may have a chance" Ok, an exaggeration, but Agassi was making believers of out of many who had given up on guys winning W without a big serve. |
|
|
|
|
| Moose Malloy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Moose Malloy |
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
There were certainly mental toughness intangibles here, but in the tangible, concrete sense, I think the better grasscourt game won. I don't simply mean Becker's 22 aces, against Agassi's 4. It's also Agassi's volleys, which produced few winners. I look over my notes and I see that Becker got the only break of the third set by throwing up lobs that drew an error -- an overhead error as I recall.
Agassi essentially was in the zone and was playing great defense, but his offense was nothing remarkable; at least not against Becker's defense. Becker, on the other hand, had all those serves and volley winners, and on top of that he played strong defense. He had 17 ground stroke winners, and would have had more passing shots if Agassi had presented more of a target. His ground strokes, in a way, gave him the edge in the match. Though he was not baselining with Agassi, he got his first break with those two strong baseline rallies that we mentioned. And the break in the third, he got by throwing up lobs. It took only one error (on grass that's often all it took), but Agassi made it -- at the net. That's where Andre showed no particular strength, however amazing his defense was. McEnroe said that Becker played a smart match, mixing it up well, and by that he didn't mean that Boris was slowing down the pace; that was not Becker's style. But he was adventurous with the way he played points, because he had both offense and defense: big flat serves, topspin, slice approaches. He came in a lot, but not always on a predictable ball, because he could rally too. So he kept Agassi off balance and applied constant pressure. And he made all his first serves in the tiebreaks -- big serves generally giving a player an advantage in tiebreaks, especially on fast surfaces. I haven't seen their 95 USO semi since then, but if Agassi took both tiebreaks there, that means he played the big points better there. That's why I don't think the W win comes down to Becker's mental toughness; Agassi could be mentally superior himself, in other matches. I just don't think he had enough to defeat Becker's best grasscourt game; and I think he would have lost to Sampras anyway, though in a close match. Last edited by krosero : 12-13-2007 at 05:02 PM. Reason: correction about breaks |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
|
HI Krosero,
thanks for bringing up this match. i am a great becker fan and i love the way he turned it around in this match. also, i doubt how many people on this board have seen their 1989 davis cup match. it was a match of the highest quality. sometimes i wonder what would've happened to the agassi-becker rivalry if agassi had not got the idea to read becker's serve based on becker's tongue (as agassi had told in his commentary during the USO QF between fed and roddick). i think it would have been more even. becker had a great serve, though not at sampras' level. also, i still believe that becker would've given sampras a better fight than agassi in the 1995 USO F if he had got through, simply bcos he would've held serve much more consistently. we would've had at least 2-3 tie-breaks. |
|
|
|
| shakes1975 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by shakes1975 |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
I wonder how much of a factor the tongue thing could have been. How consistently can you see something like that from so far away? But then again Agassi had incomparable eyes. The 1995 USO final, you may be right, though I think that you and I might agree that Sampras would still have won. In 1990, if Boris had beaten Andre in their semi, I think he would have lost to Pete. That may sound defeatist, but who could have beaten Sampras that day? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,038
|
Cool thread. I loved that match.
iirc, at 6-2, 4-1 down [or right before that], Boris shook his head and looked like he was going to pack it in. Then he started really boogeying at the baseline and slicing his Bh short x-ct to Dre's bh. Not the BH to Bh matchup ANdre enjoyed. Boris would earn a short ball and often come in. That paid off a lot more than predictably coming in. Is it my imagination, or did Andre lose some intensity at the end of the 2nd set there? Well, anyway, what a great match. Inspiring: the tenacity despite the rough matchup and the fact that Andre could have gone on to just roll him.... a subtle tactic change and the triumph of a game more suited to a grass court. Bravo Boris. Last edited by slice bh compliment : 12-13-2007 at 06:10 PM. |
|
|
|
| slice bh compliment |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by slice bh compliment |
|
|
#15 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 127
|
During the second set, something happened during a rally, and the crowd sort of chuckled, as did AA. Pretty much everyone except Boris. That event seemed to renew Boris's fighting spirit. He settled down, changed his tactics and put one on AA.
At the US Open they played in the Semi's. The incident was mentioned then. AA got the better of Boris in that match, but it was close. |
|
|
|
| Buchhalter |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Buchhalter |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,038
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| slice bh compliment |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by slice bh compliment |
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
He said something I didn't know: that at one point Becker stopped doing this with his tongue; and Andre joked about how panic set in for him then. There's really only one match that he could be referring to, this 1995 loss at Wimbledon, because it was the only time that Becker beat him after 1989 (and so many of us have commented on the panicked look in Agassi's eyes). Their 1995 USO semi was to be their last match until one more Agassi win in 1999, so maybe at the USO Boris was not doing it. Who knows. One thing I do know is how close this Wimbledon match was, regardless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
I went through this match again and proofed my original counts; I made a few corrections to the original post. I also got a few extra counts and checked against NBC's stats.
Per NBC, as of 3-5 in the third set: Agassi's unforced errors: Set 1 - 1 Set 2 - 8 Set 3 - 7 Agassi's winners: Set 1 - 14 (I have 12) Set 2 - 14 (I have 13) Set 3 - 8 (I have 7) I counted only clean winners and aces, so I'm falling a little short of NBC's numbers. But in this second viewing I judged some shots as winners that were not clean winners -- and if I “plug in” those judgment calls, my numbers line up with NBC’s. I gave Agassi judgment calls on two FH’s in the first set, another in the second, and one more at the start of the third. For the remainder of the match after NBC’s display of Agassi's winners, I gave him judgment calls on two BH’s, a FH and a service winner. So in all, including judgment calls, I gave Agassi 60 winners for the match. NBC never presented Becker's winners, but on top of his 71 clean winners and aces I gave him 4 service winners, and no other judgment calls. So my total for Becker was 75 winners. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
|
At 3-4 in the second, NBC had Agassi had 8 "return aces", same as my count.
At 3-4 in the fourth, NBC had Becker hitting his "24th volley winner" (I had 19 volleys and 5 smashes). |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|