|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 117
|
Hello;
I've been testing my C10 Pro (2008 Version), and I'm so impressed. It weights like 350 grams with the overgrip plus the dampener, but his H.L. balance, do this stick, a friendly arm racket. I'm very impressed, its so playable, the feel with the ball is really great, it hasn't a big sweet spot, but this racket, has a lot of control, I've never found a racket with more control than this, anyway I didn't tested all the rackets of the world obviously, but the control and the precision are great too. One thing that I loved from this stick, is the spin, is so easy use it to generate a lot of spin, it impressed me so much. I liked it on the serve, it's easy move this racket to generate power, at least it's easy for me, I loved the feeling hitting with the backhand or forehand, this stick impressed me in general. Let here your opinions and screenies, about this famous and great stick, Völkl answered me on Facebook, and they told me that they're working on new cosmetic for 2012. Join our club! Regards, Carlos.
__________________
Völkl/Yonex user! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,166
|
I use the C10 Pro Tour model. I liked this model better than the C10 version. I still use the C10 Pro Tour as my main racquet. It is a great stick. Nothing wrong with the C10 Pro. I just thought the PT was a little more stable at the net and I had better control with it. I'll be an honorary member I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,357
|
I don't use one because I couldn't get my hands on my favourite of the C10 Pro line the Xtended version.
Loved that frame. Lighter than the standard, ca. 310g, 27,6 inches long. Very mobile. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 117
|
It's a classic frame, but it's the favourite stick of a lot of people from the whole Völkl series, it's nice.
Regards, Carlos.
__________________
Völkl/Yonex user! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,840
|
|
|
|
|
| chrischris |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by chrischris |
|
|
#6 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: at the bottom of every hill I come to
Posts: 11,116
|
Back when the C10 lines was first introduced, there were 3 models, the C10, C10 Xtended, and C10 OS. The latter two were spectacular frames, neither sold well and both were discontinued.
__________________
Wilson Steam 99S poly Luxilon 4G 1.25 @ 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,166
|
Rabbit, don't forget about the C10 Pro Tour version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 117
|
I've been playing 2 hours today with it, I'm lovin' and lovin' and lovin' it each day that I use it...
100% graphite, thats great!
__________________
Völkl/Yonex user! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 423
|
Count me in, i own the second version, post fischcale. one handed backhands are just insane, very soft in the upper hoop, it flexes very much on that side. Overall, i love more the torsional stability of the Tour 10 gen 1, but the C10's touch and volleys are topless. IMHO the Black and Yellow 2008's version it's one of the best paint-job ever.
__________________
Volkl Tour 10 Generation 1 Midplus. 353 gr, balance 32 cm, flex 62, SW 331 Last edited by Cesare : 07-25-2011 at 02:42 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
New User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 16
|
Great racquet!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 122
|
I demoed c10 pro last Sept., loved the feel of it, but i wasnt good enough to play with such heavy stick
__________________
Prince EXO3 Tour 16x18|| iPrestige MP XL ||MG Prestige MP |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 423
|
and that 2008 version stills really beautiful. probably even better cosmetics than my bumblebee version. better than the new yellow one, and it's the same racquet, but way cheaper. nice.
__________________
Volkl Tour 10 Generation 1 Midplus. 353 gr, balance 32 cm, flex 62, SW 331 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Regards.
__________________
Völkl/Yonex user! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,607
|
Alas, I am leaving the C10 Pro club in the near future. It has absolutely nothing to do with the frame itself with the exception of the weight. And again, it is not the fault of the frame, just that my shoulder can no longer handle the heft vs. college players for 3 sets.
I weighed mine the other day, and w/ strings/overgrip/dampener, it came in @ 12.6oz. I'm now looking at frames in the 12-12.2oz range to see if it helps with longevity. Great frame, just too much heft for my 43yr old shoulder to handle. Look for some used 2008s in the 'For Sale' section in the coming weeks...
__________________
"Nobody beats Vitas Gerulaitis 17 times in a row" -- Vitas Gerulaitis, after beating Jimmy Connors on his 17th try. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 117
|
Quote:
Regards, Carlos.
__________________
Völkl/Yonex user! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,607
|
Again, I also found it arm-friendly, its just that my shoulder becomes fatigued from the weight & me trying to hit w/ 5.0 players 1/2 my age in 100 degree heat on clay.
Change it to fast indoor courts, and I can still hang w/ the young guns, but when my strike zone is raised to above my shoulders, eventually I become worn down. I've tried moving in and moving back, but in each case my whole game gets screwed up. I probably need some form of surgery, but I'm not willing to take 6-9 months off. And to reiterate, I believe the injury comes from repeated falls on the wakeboard & snowboard, where my arm is either snapped back hard or my shoulder driven into the ground, NOT the racket.
__________________
"Nobody beats Vitas Gerulaitis 17 times in a row" -- Vitas Gerulaitis, after beating Jimmy Connors on his 17th try. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,294
|
Instead of camping out deep or shallow, stand where the ball is comfortable for you where they hit the deepest, and then, learn to walk-thru all balls during contact, like approach shots, and you will never have this issue. Each time you hit the ball moving forward, retreat to you original real estate position from where you started. Sampras used to do that all the time when he was just becoming great, around '90, when his groundies were still suspect because his serve was not yet too much for everyone. It kept his BH from being shredded.
|
|
|
|
| TennisMaverick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TennisMaverick |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,294
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| TennisMaverick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TennisMaverick |
|
|
#19 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,981
|
Quote:
__________________
check the facts before believing what you read and hear...or accept blame for not doing so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 253
|
Hopefully TennisMaverick and others can chime in on aspects of the C10 Pro with respect to my T10 VE MP bats.
I remember seeing a post by Rush or someone who mentioned that the T10 VE MP was the direct followup of the C10 Pro rather than the DNX and PB sticks. Can any of you remember this? More importantly, can you confirm this in practical terms if you have played with both? What is the sweet spot comparison between the two in practical terms? I am not sure how the C10 Pros spec out in terms of Swing Weight but all my T10 VE MPs were 313-115 in SW which from memory, is well below the average SW of 320 measured on TW. I could be wrong there Anyway, how do your C10 Pros feel in SW? Even better, have you measured your bats? Once my 4 T10 VE MP bats die, it is time to look for new and similar candidates so all the info is appreciated. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|