Northeast Tennis

BigEastStorm · 11-21-2011, 10:33 AM

I know it doesn't have the highest ranked team but it's a very competitive region. Here's a breakdown of some of the favorites of the region, all who will also compete at the ECACs.

St Johns:
Returns 5 starters, and only lost their number 6 player who they replaced with Texas transfer Vasko Mladenov. Arguably have the best 1-5 in the region as of right now. They also have Ilija Vucic coming in January who was ranked as high as 30 in ITF juniors. Look to be the favorite this year.

Princeton:
Another team that returns 5 starters. They arguably have the best doubles in the region with the only other competition being Harvard. Solid number 1 in Pecotic. The team however will go however their 2-4 play. Their bottom is weak compared to some other years.

Harvard:
Return about 4 starters I believe. Have the higest ranked player in the region with John Pearlman even though he is very overrated as shown at regionals. One of the best doubles in the region with Princeton. Solid lineup from top to bottom. Denis Ngyuen will be asked to win alot of matches at the 3/4 position.

Those are the three favorites this year. These are some of the dark horses.

Yale:
If the top 3 come to play they could challenge most of the upper teams. However it always seems they aren't always on the same page. Not a very good bottom of the lineup but they do have solid doubles.

Brown:
Another solid team with Brandon Burke at the top spot. Have some good players however they always seem to be out of it and never play to potential.

Cornell:
Rebuilding year to be honest. However they can compete with some teams but mostly are looking forward to future years.

Columbia:
Interesting team. Haig Schniderman(SP) had the biggest win of his life at Indoors over Chase B. Solid freshmen who will be hungry. Could be a surprise this year.

DCaicedo · 11-27-2011, 06:01 PM

Johnnies in 5

BigEastStorm · 12-12-2011, 07:13 AM

whee are the northeast tennis people

BigEastStorm · 01-03-2012, 10:22 AM

Northeast Regional rankings are out

http://www.itatennis.com/AwardsAndRa...Jan-3-2012.htm

tennisjon · 01-04-2012, 05:57 AM

Quite frankly, I don't put too much stock in rankings. My team beat two teams that are ranked in the region over the past season and didn't get ranked. My first doubles team beat 3 of the teams ranked in the section and didn't get ranked. There is a bias when it comes to rankings. There is no straight formula. It is based on the coaches who do the polls and what schools that their teams play. Prior seasons of rankings help, meaning the name of your school.

andfor · 01-04-2012, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tennisjon

Quite frankly, I don't put too much stock in rankings. My team beat two teams that are ranked in the region over the past season and didn't get ranked. My first doubles team beat 3 of the teams ranked in the section and didn't get ranked. There is a bias when it comes to rankings. There is no straight formula. It is based on the coaches who do the polls and what schools that their teams play. Prior seasons of rankings help, meaning the name of your school.

Are rankings not important for at-large berths to the NCAA's?

tennisjon · 01-04-2012, 09:48 AM

They are, but at the D3 level, there are so few at-large bids. We make nationals because we win our conference. In the past, before the AQ, even when we had a high regional ranking, we were never looked at because of our prior relatively weak conference. It didn't matter that we only lost to Amherst 4-3. Schools in the NESCAC are traditionally very strong, but we beat one of them last year and they still are ranked ahead of us. NESCAC schools have limited dates of competition and most of their losses are to other NESCAC or other traditionally high ranked schools, therefore, none of those losses really ever count against themselves and it was nearly impossible in the east to get a breakthrough in the rankings over those teams. Now, with the AQ, there are less at-large bids, which means a deserving school from that conference won't get in over a conference champion from a weaker conference. However, at the same time it gives so many more schools the opportunity to compete at the national level.

BigEastStorm · 01-10-2012, 06:17 PM

St. Johns should be favored to win the ECACs in February after signing Ilija Vucic, high of 30 ITF

DCaicedo · 01-16-2012, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigEastStorm

St. Johns should be favored to win the ECACs in February after signing Ilija Vucic, high of 30 ITF

Good stuff. Have to catch them play this season.
This kid Mladenov (sp?)... prospect?

TennisMaverick · 01-16-2012, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigEastStorm

St. Johns should be favored to win the ECACs in February after signing Ilija Vucic, high of 30 ITF

Did they get their courts back?

BigEastStorm · 01-23-2012, 05:20 PM

They practice and play all their matches at the USTA Center

TennisMaverick · 01-23-2012, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigEastStorm

They practice and play all their matches at the USTA Center

So the courts on-campus were destroyed or built over?

BigEastStorm · 01-23-2012, 06:46 PM

They still have their 5 courts on campus, women's team plays/practices there

DCaicedo · 01-25-2012, 07:06 AM

^^ really? wow- haven't been by there in a while.

BigEastStorm · 01-29-2012, 09:49 AM

Cornell played Notre Dame very tough

BigEastStorm · 01-31-2012, 02:06 PM

St Johns opens up Friday against Concordia and Queens College

DCaicedo · 02-03-2012, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigEastStorm

St Johns opens up Friday against Concordia and Queens College

How'd they do? Lampa?

BigEastStorm · 02-03-2012, 01:59 PM

Beat Queens College 6-1, Comcordia 5-2

BigEastStorm · 02-04-2012, 07:21 AM

Harvard beats Vanderbilt 4-3

Clemson_tennis · 02-04-2012, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigEastStorm

Harvard beats Vanderbilt 4-3

wow big win

11-21-2011, 10:33 AM	#1
BigEastStorm New User Join Date: Sep 2011 Posts: 40	Northeast Tennis I know it doesn't have the highest ranked team but it's a very competitive region. Here's a breakdown of some of the favorites of the region, all who will also compete at the ECACs. St Johns: Returns 5 starters, and only lost their number 6 player who they replaced with Texas transfer Vasko Mladenov. Arguably have the best 1-5 in the region as of right now. They also have Ilija Vucic coming in January who was ranked as high as 30 in ITF juniors. Look to be the favorite this year. Princeton: Another team that returns 5 starters. They arguably have the best doubles in the region with the only other competition being Harvard. Solid number 1 in Pecotic. The team however will go however their 2-4 play. Their bottom is weak compared to some other years. Harvard: Return about 4 starters I believe. Have the higest ranked player in the region with John Pearlman even though he is very overrated as shown at regionals. One of the best doubles in the region with Princeton. Solid lineup from top to bottom. Denis Ngyuen will be asked to win alot of matches at the 3/4 position. Those are the three favorites this year. These are some of the dark horses. Yale: If the top 3 come to play they could challenge most of the upper teams. However it always seems they aren't always on the same page. Not a very good bottom of the lineup but they do have solid doubles. Brown: Another solid team with Brandon Burke at the top spot. Have some good players however they always seem to be out of it and never play to potential. Cornell: Rebuilding year to be honest. However they can compete with some teams but mostly are looking forward to future years. Columbia: Interesting team. Haig Schniderman(SP) had the biggest win of his life at Indoors over Chase B. Solid freshmen who will be hungry. Could be a surprise this year.

11-27-2011, 06:01 PM	#2
DCaicedo Rookie Join Date: May 2005 Location: 718 Posts: 318	Johnnies in 5 __________________ honk if you love Rick Astley

01-04-2012, 05:57 AM	#5
tennisjon Semi-Pro Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: West Orange, NJ Posts: 612	Quite frankly, I don't put too much stock in rankings. My team beat two teams that are ranked in the region over the past season and didn't get ranked. My first doubles team beat 3 of the teams ranked in the section and didn't get ranked. There is a bias when it comes to rankings. There is no straight formula. It is based on the coaches who do the polls and what schools that their teams play. Prior seasons of rankings help, meaning the name of your school. __________________ M&W Coach, Drew University. Pro Kennex Ki-5x(R) & Babolat Aeropro Drive GT+(L) Dunlop Black Widow 17 (62lb) Babolat N.Vy 16 (64lb) USTA 4.5.

01-04-2012, 09:48 AM	#7
tennisjon Semi-Pro Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: West Orange, NJ Posts: 612	They are, but at the D3 level, there are so few at-large bids. We make nationals because we win our conference. In the past, before the AQ, even when we had a high regional ranking, we were never looked at because of our prior relatively weak conference. It didn't matter that we only lost to Amherst 4-3. Schools in the NESCAC are traditionally very strong, but we beat one of them last year and they still are ranked ahead of us. NESCAC schools have limited dates of competition and most of their losses are to other NESCAC or other traditionally high ranked schools, therefore, none of those losses really ever count against themselves and it was nearly impossible in the east to get a breakthrough in the rankings over those teams. Now, with the AQ, there are less at-large bids, which means a deserving school from that conference won't get in over a conference champion from a weaker conference. However, at the same time it gives so many more schools the opportunity to compete at the national level. __________________ M&W Coach, Drew University. Pro Kennex Ki-5x(R) & Babolat Aeropro Drive GT+(L) Dunlop Black Widow 17 (62lb) Babolat N.Vy 16 (64lb) USTA 4.5.

01-25-2012, 07:06 AM	#14
DCaicedo Rookie Join Date: May 2005 Location: 718 Posts: 318	^^ really? wow- haven't been by there in a while. __________________ honk if you love Rick Astley