• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page How BAD are these Gamma racquets really?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2012, 07:34 PM   #1
Lilguy1456
Semi-Pro
 
Lilguy1456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 447
Default How BAD are these Gamma racquets really?

I know this subject has been touched on, but wow. Every other TW review has each racquet coming in at AT LEAST 70 points in EVERY category, and these Gammas are pulling 40s, 50s, etc? Will ANYONE purchase or even demo these CLUBS after reading that?
__________________
4.0 | Yonex RDX 500 Mid | Volkl Cylone 17 @52lb
Lilguy1456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Lilguy1456
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Lilguy1456
Old 08-09-2012, 08:32 PM   #2
mad dog1
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,070
Default

what are you talking about? the RZR 98 and 98 T got good scores.

Gamma RZR 98 Scores
Comfort 67
Touch/Feel 72
Serves 81
Groundstrokes 72
Returns 72
Slice 80
Topspin 83
Volleys 74
Overall 72

Gamma RZR 98 T Scores
Comfort 56
Touch/Feel 53
Serves 75
Groundstrokes 66
Returns 66
Slice 76
Topspin 81
Volleys 68
Overall 68
mad dog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
mad dog1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mad dog1
Old 08-09-2012, 10:02 PM   #3
sstchur
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,461
Default

They are good racquets. I've used them all. I like the 98 and the 100T the best, but the 98T is also really good.

I hit with a former Univ of New Mexico player a couple of weeks ago and he was using the 98T, and let me tell you: this guy can PLAY. If it's good enough for him, it's certainly good enough for many of the 3.5s and 4.0s on these boards.

But really though, don't just go by TW reviews. It's a small group of people with a specific style of game testing these racquets. They have their racquet preferences and it happens to be something other than the RZRs, but that doesn't mean the RZRs are bad.

Folks should try them. They're solid sticks.

I use a Gamma personally, but I use an older model Gamma (the T-7) because it's comfortable to me and my game is grooved around it. But when I eventually go through my remainder of T-7s, I'll probably be looking seriously at the 98 or the 100T.
sstchur is offline   Reply With Quote
sstchur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sstchur
Old 08-10-2012, 08:00 PM   #4
Lilguy1456
Semi-Pro
 
Lilguy1456's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mad dog1 View Post
what are you talking about? the RZR 98 and 98 T got good scores.

Gamma RZR 98 Scores
Comfort 67
Touch/Feel 72
Serves 81
Groundstrokes 72
Returns 72
Slice 80
Topspin 83
Volleys 74
Overall 72

Gamma RZR 98 T Scores
Comfort 56
Touch/Feel 53
Serves 75
Groundstrokes 66
Returns 66
Slice 76
Topspin 81
Volleys 68
Overall 68
There isn't a racquet on the site that scored 50s and 60s in anything...how are those scores "good"? If the scores don't matter, they don't matter....but comparitively, yes, they are BAD scores lol
__________________
4.0 | Yonex RDX 500 Mid | Volkl Cylone 17 @52lb
Lilguy1456 is offline   Reply With Quote
Lilguy1456
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Lilguy1456
Old 08-09-2012, 10:13 PM   #5
zapvor
Legend
 
zapvor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: tennis courts
Posts: 7,908
Send a message via MSN to zapvor Send a message via Yahoo to zapvor
Default

the gammas are not that bad actually.
__________________
Member of TW MAC. yes, we are better than you. and we bout to hop on a court to make another 'mil
zapvor is offline   Reply With Quote
zapvor
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by zapvor
Old 08-09-2012, 10:30 PM   #6
SFrazeur
Legend
 
SFrazeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 1164 Morning Glory Circle
Posts: 5,656
Default


"The Points Don't Matter!"
__________________
Babolat Pure Drive Roddick GT (1/4) w/ Skin Feel replacment grip.
Solinco Tour Bite 16 @ 55 and Tourna Grip XL

Last edited by SFrazeur : 08-10-2012 at 08:43 AM.
SFrazeur is offline   Reply With Quote
SFrazeur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by SFrazeur
Old 08-09-2012, 11:01 PM   #7
PBODY99
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,752
Default Not bad at all

From the Tradition 18 to today, Gamma has produced "players frames" that when played work just fine. Tennis is more a game of operator error, than equipment failure.
__________________
GAMMA 4000 + WISE | PRINCE SPEEDPORT GOLD
PBODY99 is offline   Reply With Quote
PBODY99
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by PBODY99
Old 08-10-2012, 04:46 AM   #8
sstchur
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PBODY99 View Post
From the Tradition 18 to today, Gamma has produced "players frames" that when played work just fine. Tennis is more a game of operator error, than equipment failure.
That Tradition 18 was a sweet stick! Every now and again, you'll see on on the bay for sale. I worked at a small little sports shop in PA when I was in high school which carried Gamma racquets. The Tradition 18 and the Tradition 20 were fun racquets to hit with.
sstchur is offline   Reply With Quote
sstchur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sstchur
Old 08-10-2012, 09:58 AM   #9
jnd28
Rookie
 
jnd28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 305
Default

I played with the RZR 100T and really liked it. Very different sort of specs. You dont find a 100 with an open string pattern with that kind of swing weight. You can really hit a heavy ball. Great serving stick. One should really put this on their demo list as it offers something different than what just about anyone else is offering. Its like a pure drive on steroids. You can really push people around with this frame. Lots of spin, great plow through and it will stand up to anything that anyone can throw at you!

I ended up replacing it with the Dunlop Max 200G that I found to be a little more maneuverable and more appropriate for my "old school" game. But I havent sold the RZR!

JND28
__________________
Volkl Organix 7 310 Weiss Scorpion 55#
jnd28 is offline   Reply With Quote
jnd28
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jnd28
Old 08-10-2012, 10:18 AM   #10
sstchur
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnd28 View Post
I played with the RZR 100T and really liked it. Very different sort of specs. You dont find a 100 with an open string pattern with that kind of swing weight. You can really hit a heavy ball. Great serving stick. One should really put this on their demo list as it offers something different than what just about anyone else is offering. Its like a pure drive on steroids. You can really push people around with this frame. Lots of spin, great plow through and it will stand up to anything that anyone can throw at you!

I ended up replacing it with the Dunlop Max 200G that I found to be a little more maneuverable and more appropriate for my "old school" game. But I havent sold the RZR!

JND28
"You can really push people around with this frame. Lots of spin, great plow through and it will stand up to anything that anyone can throw at you! "

^^ This is particularly true.

I also find that these RZR racquets seems to really shine when you have a full western grip and play that youthful, topspin-heavy, baseline game.

I had much more success with the 100T when I forced myself to go full western, and I was indeed able to hit some crushing groundstrokes with it.
sstchur is offline   Reply With Quote
sstchur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sstchur
Old 08-10-2012, 11:00 AM   #11
ptb5021
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Is the consensus that the 100T is the best of the bunch? I generally have an issue keeping the ball in play using tweener frames - since I don't normally like going full western.

Any good words on the 98? Personally my favorite cosmetics...
  Reply With Quote
ptb5021
Old 08-10-2012, 11:33 AM   #12
sstchur
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptb5021 View Post
Is the consensus that the 100T is the best of the bunch? I generally have an issue keeping the ball in play using tweener frames - since I don't normally like going full western.

Any good words on the 98? Personally my favorite cosmetics...
I like the 98 also. It's lighter and more maneuverable. The tradeoff is a little less stability. But I haven't tried weighting it up at all, and I suspect that might help. I have my T-7 weighted with 8g of lead in the handle and 4g at 12 o clock. I would probably try something similar with the 98.

In terms of "feel" I think I might like the 98 the best. And in terms of a kick serve, I've never gotten more arc over the net or a higher bounce on my kick serve than with the 98.

And I agree the cosmetics of it are the nicest.
sstchur is offline   Reply With Quote
sstchur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sstchur
Old 08-10-2012, 11:31 AM   #13
Chotobaka
Semi-Pro
 
Chotobaka's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 574
Default

Like many of Gamma's products, their racquets are designed and manufactured through Toalson. Good quality equipment sold in the Japanese market.
Chotobaka is offline   Reply With Quote
Chotobaka
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Chotobaka
Old 08-10-2012, 11:38 AM   #14
jbleiman
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 112
Default

i recently got a blackracquet 98...same as rzr 98...really like it...like it so much that i had 2 babolat aeropro drive non cortex original versions that i sold because i liked it better...so don't go by the tw reviews...everybody has a different opinion
jbleiman is offline   Reply With Quote
jbleiman
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jbleiman
Old 08-10-2012, 11:58 AM   #15
aced_Tezuka
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 114
Default

The 98 is beautiful. Plus it's very nice. Unstable at times though. But I personally liked it. So yeah, I agree with most of the comments in this thread.
aced_Tezuka is offline   Reply With Quote
aced_Tezuka
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by aced_Tezuka
Old 08-10-2012, 12:16 PM   #16
ptb5021
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chotobaka View Post
Like many of Gamma's products, their racquets are designed and manufactured through Toalson. Good quality equipment sold in the Japanese market.
They aren't based in Pittsburgh anymore?

Also, has anyone noticed any NCAA or ATP players using these? Or is the marketing/endorsements not there yet?
  Reply With Quote
ptb5021
Old 08-10-2012, 12:22 PM   #17
aced_Tezuka
Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptb5021 View Post
They aren't based in Pittsburgh anymore?

Also, has anyone noticed any NCAA or ATP players using these? Or is the marketing/endorsements not there yet?
They are still based in Pittsburgh but their stuff is manufactured in Japan.

Also I read that Gamma doesn't sponsor anyone for their string or racquets. A shame really. :/ But pros do use Gamma though just no sponsorships I believe.
aced_Tezuka is offline   Reply With Quote
aced_Tezuka
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by aced_Tezuka
Old 08-10-2012, 12:32 PM   #18
power level 800
Semi-Pro
 
power level 800's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 552
Default

I'm afraid to try any of their new stuff because the beam. The paint jobs are awesome. I know alot of ppl on here don't follow the reviews on here but I kinda do. I dont know why cause I know everyone has a different swing and technique. It just I got mixed reviews. I personally own Gamma racquets, none of the new line that came out but have nothing negative to say about the quality control that I do own. The specs for the 98 do sound like fun though.
power level 800 is offline   Reply With Quote
power level 800
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by power level 800
Old 08-10-2012, 12:47 PM   #19
sstchur
Professional
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 1,461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aced_Tezuka View Post
They are still based in Pittsburgh but their stuff is manufactured in Japan.

Also I read that Gamma doesn't sponsor anyone for their string or racquets. A shame really. :/ But pros do use Gamma though just no sponsorships I believe.
Vera was sponsored with them for a while, and while she no longer is, I believe she still uses Gamma strings: Zo Verve crossed with TNT I think, not 100% sure though.
sstchur is offline   Reply With Quote
sstchur
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by sstchur
Old 08-10-2012, 12:53 PM   #20
A_Instead
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 596
Send a message via AIM to A_Instead Send a message via Yahoo to A_Instead
Default

My club pro switched from the Prestige to the 98T.
And swears by it.. Plus plays fantastic with it..
A_Instead is offline   Reply With Quote
A_Instead
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by A_Instead
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page How BAD are these Gamma racquets really?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse