|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
|
Little backstory, I've played with the BLX90 ever since I started tennis a few years back (not a smart choice but it was the only racket I could use given that my brother plays with them). I advanced pretty well and got most things down soon enough, however my inexperience still remained and I more than often hit outside of the small sweetspot or am a bit late when it comes to returning (although it remains the finest racket to hit one handed backhands with)
Recently I came into a bit of money of my own to spend and I narrowed it down to the Wilson K factor Surge and the Dunlop Biomimetic 500. These rackets are very similar to each other with the biggest change I noticed being the spin - simply unbelievable compared to the Tour 90. Especially on doing second serves I can hit the ball as hard as I can and it'll always go in, and usually with a much much bigger kick. With the tour90 I usually had to tone it down a bit, do more of a looser grip and even then I would still miss a second serve 1 out of 5 times So yes, the heavy top spin is great but to achieve it I feel I have to force my swings a bit more, and especially with the grip I have to hold it a lot tighter otherwise my racket won't keep steady on contact. But with the tighter grip I can't seem to do natural swings anymore like I did with the tour 90. I used to hold this one with a lot less grip and the racket head speed would usually be enough to keep the racket steady with it's weight and/or balance So now my question is, am I supposed to hold the K Surge tighter compared to the 6.1 90? Or are there some other tips I can use to keep that natural swing throughout, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 1,371
|
It may be a grip size issue. Go one size bigger and you won't have to squeeze as hard to hit with the racquet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,629
|
Very good answer.
I switched to Aero500's last year. The drop in weight from my 200's is about TWO full ounces, and the SW by about 15 points. I hold both very loosely except for hard, deep incoming balls, which I grip harder and shorten my swing. 5'11" and 150 lbs., 4 5/8 with an overgrip. Never twists unless the player I'm facing is a 5.5, at which point, I have no business hitting with him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 993
|
Good question and answer. I am poised to get the Bio 500.
I suspect its a case of adjusting the way you grip depending on the shot you play. Returning a heavy ball is bound to create the situation where a firmer grip is required, but otherwise I would try different ways of gripping to see what works. My only concern is going to a larger grip that works for some shots might not suit your all round game and overall grip comfort.
__________________
X2 Dunlop Biomimetic 300 / X2 Prince Exo3 93 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,629
|
And don't forget, a 500 is inherently more powerful than most other rackets (except PureDrives), has a big head size, and is easy to swing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
|
Thanks for the help guys, I already noticed improvements when adding a thick overgrip
And robbo, I see what you mean, I have to play more with a western grip, since playing eastern is a bit more difficult now but after some practice I can go back to my old style. I guess it was mostly a matter of adjusting And yes, the 500 is definitely a great racket! Services are much much more exploding and returning goes quite a bit better (faster). Only with my 1hbh I had some trouble with short strokes, but I believe this is also a case of just gripping it a bit more |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|