Murray's draw is a joke...again

[The Bawss]

I am going to get hate from Mainad/Fedex/batz but I don't care, it has to be said: Murray's draw has once again, evaporised.

Let's have a look at his draw to the SFs : Bye, W/O, Lolgopolov, OLD Stepanek.

Then when he wins the Murray brigade will be out pointing out how awesome he is and how many MS1000s he has and how "Lendl has transformed him" and "he is riding the wave of confidence winning his first GS gave him".

Now I expect the usual "Was it windy in Shanghai?" and "Ingerlund" remarks.

[Sentinel]

Meanwhile, poor Fed has a brutal draw with home favorite Lu, compat Lolrinka and a tired Cilic up next.

I fully expect the Murray trio to come in guns blazing. They are probably having a conference as we speak for how to handle this men_ace of a thread. (check my sig).

[The Bawss]

Originally Posted by Sentinel

Meanwhile, poor Fed has a brutal draw with home favorite Lu, compat Lolrinka and a tired Cilic up next.

I fully expect the Murray trio to come in guns blazing. They are probably having a conference as we speak for how to handle this men_ace of a thread. (check my sig).

Fed's draw is easy as well but not compared to Muzzah's. Stepanek and Haas have a tough draw.

Yeah, the Murray trinity is vicious, I agree with tsitrapukcipeht.

[batz]

Originally Posted by The Bawss

Fed's draw is easy as well but not compared to Muzzah's. Stepanek and Haas have a tough draw.

Yeah, the Murray trinity is vicious, I agree with tsitrapukcipeht.

You can call us Sid, Sidd and Sidney Vicious. Then you can dry your eyes.

[tennis_pro]

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=418236

We should make 1 big thread for Murray's draws. It looks like a trend these days when seemingly he gets the hardest draw and then everyone who can cause any problems to him loses.

[batz]

Originally Posted by tennis_pro

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=418236

We should make 1 big thread for Murray's draws. It looks like a trend these days when seemingly he gets the hardest draw and then everyone who can cause any problems to him loses.

He sure is lucky that Murray guy. Not like Unlucky Roger, No Luck Noel, and Humble Luck Rafa - those guys always have to play the toughest opponent possible - like Stan, and Troicki, and Verdasco.

And don't get me started on the bloody wind.

[tennis_pro]

Originally Posted by batz

He sure is lucky that Murray guy. Not like Unlucky Roger, No Luck Noel, and Humble Luck Rafa - those guys always have to play the toughest opponent possible - like Stan, and Troicki, and Verdasco.

And don't get me started on the bloody wind.

Dude relax, every top player gets his share of easy draws. It's not any different with Murray. However, it's kinda weird that quite often his seemingly tougher draws turn to dust after a couple of days.

For your reference, Murray had one heck of a draw at Wimbledon even with Nadal out early and nearly pulled through in the end.

[Mainad]

Originally Posted by The Bawss

I am going to get hate from Mainad/Fedex/batz but I don't care, it has to be said: Murray's draw has once again, evaporised.

Hate? None of us hate you. We don't hate anybody. We leave the hating to you and the others on here who feel the constant need to post these endless, pointless threads about how lucky Murray is at every single tournament he ever plays.

Originally Posted by The Bawss

: Let have a look at his draw to the SFs : Bye, W/O, Lolgopolov, OLD Stepanek.

Let's have a look at the other draws. Federer: Bye, Lu (lol), Stan (his favourite pigeon), Cilic (part of Murray's easy USO draw according to you) .

Djokovic: Bye, Dimitrov (please!), Lopez (part of Murray's easy draw at USO according to you) and then gets to play dear old Tommy Haas for a place in the semis otherwise it would have been HIS dear, old favourite pigeon, Tipsy lol!

So yeah Murray didn't get to play Mayer. Lucky, jammy sod!

Originally Posted by The Bawss

Then when he wins the Murray brigade will be out pointing out how awesome he is and how many MS1000s he has and how "Lendl has transformed him" and "he is riding the wave of confidence winning his first GS gave him".

So, won't any of that be true then?

Originally Posted by The Bawss

Now I expect the usual "Was it windy in Shanghai?".

Well, we won't know whether it was too windy unless Murray manages to win the tournament, will we? If he wins it, I'm sure you'll be tripping over yourself to point it out. If he doesn't win it, then the wind was obviously no factor for the guy who does and you can safely go back to telling us what a useless, talentless, pusher he has always been!

Reckon I've got that about right??

[3fees]

Looks like a Federer-Murray-Showdown for a place in the finals,,,ha

[TheF1Bob]

What you expect? He needs special circumstances to win anything these days, this being one of them.

Disgusting.

[batz]

Originally Posted by TheF1Bob

What you expect? He needs special circumstances to win anything these days, this being one of them.

Disgusting.

PMSL - good one Bob.

[Clarky21]

Not as big of a joke as Cvac's endless Duncan Hines draws.

[decrepitude]

Ok, I confess. I'm a witch and I fix Andy's draws.

[jokinla]

Murray gets easy draws, but they all do, Rafa's 2010 US Open comes to mind.

[The Bawss]

If Del Potro had Murray's draws, he would be a multi slam champion no doubt.

[Mainad]

Originally Posted by The Bawss

If Del Potro had Murray's draws, he would be a multi slam champion no doubt.

I don't think Del Potro would fit into Murray's draws!

[NadalAgassi]

Originally Posted by The Bawss

If Del Potro had Murray's draws, he would be a multi slam champion no doubt.

Del Potro with Murray's draws would be a multi slam Champion, LOL. Murray didnt lose to any opponent in a slam final Del Potro would have beaten on those days, and had they switched draws at the 09 U.S Open the Murray upset to Cilic never would have happened, they play one another in the quarters, and given their history on hard courts it is bye bye to Del Potro's only slam (while Murray possibly has 2 of them now). Maybe Del Potro should win a single Masters title before his fans trump his chances of multiple slams.

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by NadalAgassi

Del Potro with Murray's draws would be a multi slam Champion, LOL. Murray didnt lose to any opponent in a slam final Del Potro would have beaten on those days, and had they switched draws at the 09 U.S Open the Murray upset to Cilic never would have happened, they play one another in the quarters, and given their history on hard courts it is bye bye to Del Potro's only slam (while Murray possibly has 2 of them now). Maybe Del Potro should win a single Masters title before his fans trump his chances of multiple slams.

NadalAgassi, out of thread, do you think that Prisoner of birth and TMF are same person? I think they are....

[NadalAgassi]

Originally Posted by Gonzo_style

NadalAgassi, out of thread, do you think that Prisoner of birth and TMF are same person? I think they are....

Hmm I hadnt thought about it, but it is possible. They seem to have in common their extreme hatred of 60s or 70s tennis, their extreme bias to all players past, and their disdain for the WTA (especialy the Williams). Prisoner of birth though does seem smarter than TMF though (not that this is difficult to manage) so it is hard to say.

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by NadalAgassi

Hmm I hadnt thought about it, but it is possible. They seem to have in common their extreme hatred of 60s or 70s tennis, their extreme bias to all players past, and their disdain for the WTA (especialy the Williams). Prisoner of birth though does seem smarter than TMF though (not that this is difficult to manage) so it is hard to say.

A lot of evidence...