|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,183
|
Just curious what your thoughts are about that extra 0.5 inches on a tennis racket and whether it makes a noticeable and improved difference to your game, specifically in terms of maneuverability and timing. I mean 0.5 inches is just 1.27 cms right? All the extra long rackets back in the day came in at 28 inches, a full inch longer. So half an inch isn't that big a deal now, right? Or is it??
![]() I'm referring mainly to the AeroPro Drive + and Pure Drive + models. I can live with the regular versions but it would be nice if they were slightly more headlight. If I don't wanna bother with lead mods, should I simply migrate to the Plusses?
__________________
Before TW: POG Mid user for over 20 years After TW: confirmed racketholic |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: at the bottom of every hill I come to
Posts: 11,115
|
I think for most of us the answer is no. Pros? Maybe. I think your answer lies in the dearth of the once faddish extended length racquets available now. Michael Chang made them popular, but they've gone the way of wide body frames, Titanium Racquets, and soon Amplifeel!
__________________
Wilson Steam 99S poly Luxilon 4G 1.25 @ 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 183
|
It really depends. The extended length racquets are going to feel more sluggish but offer you more power and less control. It's really a tradeoff about what you want.
__________________
Vamos. |
|
|
|
| thecrusher956 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by thecrusher956 |
|
|
#4 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 161
|
I have an extended and a regular length. I normally play with the 27 but when I hit with the extended I can feel it big time. It does have a more draggy feeling to it, but does help out on the serve and forehand. I have a 1 handed backhand though, so that's why I don't normally use them.
__________________
No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. - Yoda Dunlop F 3.0 Tour |
|
|
|
| PrincessAdam |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PrincessAdam |
|
|
#5 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 664
|
I have 2 Ripsticks (29") and a Thunderbolt (28.5")
The added reach can come in handy, but they are a lot harder to swing and the Ripsticks wrecked my wrist. The serve does come in harder withthe extended racquets , however I have to say that I've never served better than with my regular length Prince Boron. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
New User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 26
|
I think once you get used to them, if you ever go down to a standard length again you'll feel like you have all the control in the world... that being said, I love the control I get from my APD+'s
__________________
APD+ 2013 - Twisted Razor / Thunder Blast |
|
|
|
| Roddickulous |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Roddickulous |
|
|
#7 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,491
|
Control from the APD? Were you playing with a 40 inch racket before?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 2,357
|
I'd say that the difference will vary depending on many factors.
I am more than certain that short players will benefit more from the extra reach, especially if they play with a 2 handed backhand. Sara Errani certainly feels that the switch to an extended length racquet helped her out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 343
|
I am a 3.5 player and can feel a difference. The extra reach on serves and groundstrokes are unmatched, but my net game suffered badly. Once you get use to the extra swing weight that comes with the extra length, it probably won't make that big of a difference. I think my problem was mainly psychosomatic. If you continuously switch back and forth for an extended period of time, it will only amplify the differences. This, of course, is only my humble opinion. Try it and let us know your thoughts. It would make for an interesting thread.
|
|
|
|
| Faithfulfather |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Faithfulfather |
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,562
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| parasailing |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by parasailing |
|
|
#11 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 372
|
I feel the difference. Have been playing with xl racquets for so long now. I can't get adapted to standard length racquets anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,037
|
If you want to experiment without actually demoing, just try gripping your racquet a half inch closer to the hoop. It will dramatically increase mobility and consequently headspeed, but makes the racquet feel less stable. Try it.
__________________
I have come to the conclusion that I simply don't know what I don't know. |
|
|
|
| Winners or Errors |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Winners or Errors |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 580
|
Quote:
So looking at TWU the only long rkt in the top serving category was the pure storm tour GT+. also the only time my arm bothered me was in using the + rkts, I am sure a matter of hitting a little late |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Canada Ontario
Posts: 536
|
I only notice the extra length at serves. I feel that with the extra length i always get the ball in the service box
__________________
Babolat Pure Drive 2012 | RPM Team 16g @ 55lbs |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 580
|
I should have added that speed wise no big difference, but I do agree with more in box, but outside of this more neg than pos for + compared to reg length , N.B. I play more dubs now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,174
|
Quote:
Now that it's out of the way, I do find a significant difference. Even w/ a regular length racquet, I'm very close to having my pinky off the racquet on my FH vs. BH and volleys. On my second serve, I have my pinky off the handle. If you want a more headlight racquet, I suggest you put a leather grip +overgrip or add weight. Most extended racquets also have a bigger swingweight. Although the PDR+ is 6pts HL (vs. 5) it *felt* less HL while swinging. I ended up preferring the regular length PDR as it was less stressful on my 1h-BH. If I had a 2hBH or askewed groundstrokes playing S&V, I could see myself using an extended length racquet. One thing though I have seen is people report shoulder pains w/ longer racquets, even so called arm friendly frames like the ProKennex 7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,138
|
I think that the sweet spot is a little lower on the 100 sq inch racquets compared to mids and MPs and making the racquet a little longer may move the sweetspot back to where it was before for those using smaller-headsize racquets.
I use 27 3/4 inches and I have an adjustment period when going back to 27 inch racquets. It took me about two weeks to get used to playing with 27 3/4 inches.
__________________
4 x IG Prestige MP, 70 cm, 376 grams, 386 SW, ALU Power @54 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,393
|
The extended length is more significant the more mass you have in the hoop. The amount of force striking the ball in the upper area of a heavy hoop with an extended frame is ridiculous. But to get this benefit, you also make the hoop so heavy that net exchanges become pretty difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,397
|
I have a one handed backhand and I'm about to buy a 27.5 inch racket because I'm curious about just that. Does it make a difference? Maybe it will be a good difference? Who knows, but I want to find out. I think it will be a noticeable difference, I just hope it's a positive and not a painful one. I'm 5'8'' hence the reason for trying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 323
|
I serve better with extended, my wife too.
I get TE way easier with extended. Close to body manouvrabillity is affected. Rech is awsome - I can't get passed or lobbed at the net with a 28". However, if the shot goes into the boddy... SHBH doesn't like it much either. I mostly play with 27", but have few 27.5 and 28 too. I need to find a 29" for an experiment. On the side note, it is interesting that 28" frames often have some monster SW and very HL, compared to a 27" of similar specs. Yet, somehow you don't feel that heavy SW to the full extent?
__________________
It's never too late for a happy childhood! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|