• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Miscellaneous > TW Questions/Comments
Reload this Page TW: String setup for Prestige S
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2013, 07:54 PM   #1
Minion
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 50
Default TW: String setup for Prestige S

Hi, i'm battling a bit to find the right string setup for my Prestige S.

At the moment i have my Dunlop Bio Max200G strung with Pro Hurricane Tour 16 @ 56lbs, and its perfect.

I have my Youtek Prestige MP strung with Pro Hurricane Tour 17 @ 54lbs, and is also perfect.

I tried the PHT 16 @ 56lbs in the Prestige S, but didn't quite like it - i almost expected the same result as with the BioMax200G as both have the same head size and string pattern, but it felt weird, not at all what i was looking for. So i'm a bit confused

You playtested all the above racquets, can you please offer some advise? I really like the Pro Hurricane tour strings - they're nice and crisp, great pop and doesn't hurt my elbow or shoulder.
Minion is offline   Reply With Quote
Minion
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Minion
Old 02-01-2013, 10:31 AM   #2
JackB1
Legend
 
JackB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 8,297
Default

the Presige S is lower powered than your Bio Maxx 200G. It's also known to be very string sensitive, so you may have to experiment some until you get it right. I would suggest trying a full multi in the Prestige S at around 53 lbs. Something like Xcel or NRG2 or NXT Tour.
__________________
Wilson Black Blade 104 - NXT Tour / Copoly at 55/51
JackB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
JackB1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JackB1
Old 02-02-2013, 06:56 AM   #3
Minion
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 50
Default

Thanks, will keep that in mind. I had it strung with PHT 17 @54lbs this morning, but i havent had a chance to try it out yet.
Minion is offline   Reply With Quote
Minion
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Minion
Old 02-04-2013, 07:39 AM   #4
JackB1
Legend
 
JackB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 8,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minion View Post
Thanks, will keep that in mind. I had it strung with PHT 17 @54lbs this morning, but i havent had a chance to try it out yet.
you tried PHT at 56 and didn't like it. So you try it again at 2 lbs less and expect different results??? This makes no sense to me.
__________________
Wilson Black Blade 104 - NXT Tour / Copoly at 55/51
JackB1 is offline   Reply With Quote
JackB1
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by JackB1
Old 02-04-2013, 08:16 PM   #5
Minion
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JackB1 View Post
you tried PHT at 56 and didn't like it. So you try it again at 2 lbs less and expect different results??? This makes no sense to me.
True, but there is quite a difference between PHT 16 @ 56lbs and PHT 17 @54lbs....
Minion is offline   Reply With Quote
Minion
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Minion
Old 02-04-2013, 08:48 AM   #6
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,452
Default

Hi Minion,

Can you describe what you didn't like about it? Too stiff and underpowered? Too dead off-center? Also, are you comparing apples to apples? Meaning, are you comparing broken-in PHT to freshly strung PHT? Give us some kind of reference point and we'll see if we can make a recommendation.

Jonathan
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 02-04-2013, 08:23 PM   #7
Minion
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
Hi Minion,

Can you describe what you didn't like about it? Too stiff and underpowered? Too dead off-center? Also, are you comparing apples to apples? Meaning, are you comparing broken-in PHT to freshly strung PHT? Give us some kind of reference point and we'll see if we can make a recommendation.

Jonathan
Both racquets freshly strung. In my BioMax 200G the result is perfect, i got this explosive pop, plus some very nice pocketing and great control.

With the Prestige S, i found mush less pocketing, and it felt hard to control. It may have been a dodgy string job (on the bottom part of the cap grommet shared hole - the strings were strung over each other instead of next to). It really felt springy, and unless i hit the sweet spot 100%, i had no control.

I'm not a pro, but my timing is pretty good.
Minion is offline   Reply With Quote
Minion
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Minion
Old 02-05-2013, 11:31 AM   #8
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,452
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minion View Post
Both racquets freshly strung. In my BioMax 200G the result is perfect, i got this explosive pop, plus some very nice pocketing and great control.

With the Prestige S, i found mush less pocketing, and it felt hard to control. It may have been a dodgy string job (on the bottom part of the cap grommet shared hole - the strings were strung over each other instead of next to). It really felt springy, and unless i hit the sweet spot 100%, i had no control.
Minion,

If the stringbed is too springy (as you claim), than increasing the tension is obviously an option. If you find that you cannot increase the tension without making it too "boardy", than you might consider going with a softer co-poly or even a control oriented multi (both of which would allow you to string tighter without giving away too much comfort).

Your pocketing comment is a little trickier when coupled with your other comments, so I'll just add this: some people complain of less pocketing w/stiffer strings at high tensions. So if you do increase the tension to solve your springiness issue, than be aware of how that affects whatever you mean by pocketing. Overall, though, my gut tells me you should try a softer string at a higher tension because it seems like you want to lose the excessive springiness* without also losing the "pocketing" & comfort. *I would not say the PHT is particularly springy, as polys go, but I'm trying to work with your comments.

Keep in mind: sometimes it takes a while to find the perfect string & tension for a given racquet. However, if you are having constant trouble finding the right setup for a particular racquet, you might also have to turn your focus on the racquet.

Jonathan
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse

Last edited by TW Staff : 02-05-2013 at 11:50 AM.
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 02-05-2013, 08:18 PM   #9
Minion
New User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
Minion,

If the stringbed is too springy (as you claim), than increasing the tension is obviously an option. If you find that you cannot increase the tension without making it too "boardy", than you might consider going with a softer co-poly or even a control oriented multi (both of which would allow you to string tighter without giving away too much comfort).

Your pocketing comment is a little trickier when coupled with your other comments, so I'll just add this: some people complain of less pocketing w/stiffer strings at high tensions. So if you do increase the tension to solve your springiness issue, than be aware of how that affects whatever you mean by pocketing. Overall, though, my gut tells me you should try a softer string at a higher tension because it seems like you want to lose the excessive springiness* without also losing the "pocketing" & comfort. *I would not say the PHT is particularly springy, as polys go, but I'm trying to work with your comments.

Keep in mind: sometimes it takes a while to find the perfect string & tension for a given racquet. However, if you are having constant trouble finding the right setup for a particular racquet, you might also have to turn your focus on the racquet.

Jonathan
Thanks for your comments Jonathan I have a feeling that the Prestige S might not suit my playing style. I've tried altogether 4 different string setups, but none of them worked for me. I have a fast swing speed, and can swing freely with the Prestige MP's and the Max200G, and still have the control and pocketing in the stringbed that i like. I dont know if this is related to the weight / swingweight of the racquet.

I will definitely be giving the new Biomimetic M 2.0 a try From the specs it looks almost identical to the Max200G, just a tad smaller head size.

Pity though, i really love the Prestige racquets (would sleep with them under my pillow, but the wife wont let me) , but i play better with the Max200G...so i guess that's that. Thanks again.
Minion is offline   Reply With Quote
Minion
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Minion
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Miscellaneous > TW Questions/Comments
Reload this Page TW: String setup for Prestige S

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse