Murray - I can win Roland Garros

[batz]

http://www.scotsman.com/sport/tennis...open-1-2775419

Hmmmm. Nothing is impossible, but if Rafa is anything like his usual self then he'll be winning RG - and that's before we mention Nole, Roger or even Ferrer!

I've heard that Lendl genuinely believes Murray can do serious damage on the dirt - I guess stranger things have happened at sea.

[Headshotterer]

LOL. Murray struggled against a 31 year old Federer and he thinks he can win the French, his worst surface?

[batz]

Originally Posted by Headshotterer

LOL. Murray struggled against a 31 year old Federer and he thinks he can win the French, his worst surface?

There are a lot of reasons for thinking Murray won't win RG - his performance in the AO semis isn't one of them.

Incidentally, can a player really struggle if they are never behind in the match?

[Gonzo_style]

Originally Posted by Headshotterer

LOL. Murray struggled against a 31 year old Federer and he thinks he can win the French, his worst surface?

Murray has a good attitude, if you don't believe in yourself, you will not achieve anything!

Murray doesn't care about 31 year old Federer, most important thing is that he played in AO final

[Carsomyr]

If he doesn't believe this, why even play it?

We can all have doubts about his ability to win it (and we all probably should), but if he has doubts, that would be cause for criticism. I like the attitude.

[batz]

Originally Posted by Carsomyr

If he doesn't believe this, why even play it?

We can all have doubts about his ability to win it (and we all probably should), but if he has doubts, that would be cause for criticism. I like the attitude.

I find it interesting that he is speaking in these terms. He has spoken openly before about his chances of winning the other 3 slams - prior to this, I think he'd only ever spoken before of 'doing well' at RG.

Someone is telling him he can win it. Someone whose views Murray holds in very high regard.

[raging]

Originally Posted by batz

I find it interesting that he is speaking in these terms. He has spoken openly before about his chances of winning the other 3 slams - prior to this, I think he'd only ever spoken before of 'doing well' at RG.

Someone is telling him he can win it. Someone whose views Murray holds in very high regard.

Muzza has also elected to stay on the dirt in April instead of Davis Cup in Coventry(can't say I blame him!).

Ivan is most definitely saying: this is your chance, work harder...every match.

[kalyan4fedever]

(Spanish brigade-rafa) says hi

[mariecon]

Well any player who doesn't believe he can win a tournament has no business showing up, especially a top 4 player.

[zam88]

Originally Posted by mariecon

Well any player who doesn't believe he can win a tournament has no business showing up, especially a top 4 player.

in a 128 man tournament like the French Open, if you HONESTLY polled all the players and they weren't feeding you a line, I'm sure upwards of 100 of them would say there is no realistic chance at them winning the tournament.


It might be higher.

anyone outside the top 10 would honestly be pretty delusional to really think they could win.


players dont' enter tournaments believing they can win, they enter to get paid

[tennis_pro]

I actually believe he has an outside shot. He would need a good draw, though.

[batz]

Originally Posted by tennis_pro

I actually believe he has an outside shot. He would need a good draw, though.

He would likely need to be second seed and have Rafa, Roger, Nole, Delpo and Berdych in the other half - even then he'd probably lose to Ferrer

[batz]

Originally Posted by kalyan4fedever

(Spanish brigade-rafa) says hi

Quite.

The thing is - he's one of only 4 current players to have taken a set off Rafa @ Monte Carlo and he created 18 BP against the Spaniard in their 2011 RG semi.

Again - I'm not saying I agree with him - but maybe it's not that mental a proposition....OK, it is

[mariecon]

Originally Posted by batz

Quite.

The thing is - he's one of only a handful of men to take a set off Rafa @ Monte Carlo and he created 18 BP against the Spaniard in their 2011 semi.

Again - I'm not saying I agree with him - but maybe it's not that mental a proposition....OK, it is

MC is highly overrated since it lost it's Masters1000 status. Rarely do all of the top 4 show up. So he took a set off Nadal. He still has never won a clay tournament, nor has he even made it to a clay final. The only way he could win RG is if Djoker, Nadal and Federer are all in the same half and none of them make it to the final. I'd say the chances of that happening are probably a gazillion to one.

[batz]

Originally Posted by mariecon

MC is highly overrated since it lost it's Masters1000 status. Rarely do all of the top 4 show up. So he took a set off Nadal. He still has never won a clay tournament, nor has he even made it to a clay final. The only way he could win RG is if Djoker, Nadal and Federer are all in the same half and none of them make it to the final. I'd say the chances of that happening are probably a gazillion to one.

Over-rated by whom - you? I love it when people on this forum pull assertions out of their @rse and present it as fact. It was Nadal - on clay - only 3 other current players have done so - and 2 of them are Nole and Roger.

Murray hasn't won a clay title or even made a final - that is true; but I'm sure if he entered Estoril or Cassablanca regularly, then that would change.

The fact is that Murray's record where it matters on clay i.e. at RG, is relatively decent. For example, his record matches Ferrer and is much better than 'King of the SA Swing' Nico Almagro.

[Carsomyr]

Originally Posted by batz

Over-rated by whom - you? I love it when people on this forum pull assertions out of their @rse and present it as fact. It was Nadal - on clay - only 3 other current players have done so - and 2 of them are Nole and Roger.

Murray hasn't won a clay title or even made a final - that is true; but I'm sure if he entered Estoril or Cassablanca regularly, then that would change.

The fact is that Murray's record where it matters on clay i.e. at RG, is relatively decent. For example, his record matches Ferrer and is much better than 'King of the SA Swing' Nico Almagro.

This is honestly what he should be doing. Maybe not much in the way of prestige, but it would surely boost his confidene on the surface.

[dunlop_fort_knox]

only if he is lucky enough to meet rafa in the final. otherwise no way he can win it.

[cluckcluck]

haha. Good luck with that Muzzah.

[always_crosscourt]

Strange to come out with this statement now - there is a hell of a lot of tennis to be played before we even get to the clay season.

[Carsomyr]

Murray really should be better on clay than he is. Weren't his formative years spent training on clay in Spain?