|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great NW
Posts: 5,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great NW
Posts: 5,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 114
|
So far Woodies are the best team ever. If Bryans keep up the level for some years they might get there, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the earth..?
Posts: 1,781
|
And replying to some previous posts...
Adding two AWESOME SINGLES PLAYERS together does not add up to AWESOME DOUBLES TEAM. |
|
|
|
| The Grand Slam |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Grand Slam |
|
|
#25 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Downtown Como (I)
Posts: 100
|
John McEnroe and anyone else, even me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,961
|
I like Rabbit's list. McMillin/Hewitt were great. In one of the slams, Newcombe and either Roche or Stolle were in their 40's and played McEnroe/Fleming in their prime. They took them to 5 close sets before losing.
|
|
|
|
| Steve Huff |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Steve Huff |
|
|
#27 | ||
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: at the bottom of every hill I come to
Posts: 11,150
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Wilson Steam 99S poly Luxilon 4G 1.25 @ 45 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Apple Valley, MN
Posts: 469
|
I'll say Flach and Seguso, just because I like saying Flach and Seguso. And because Seguso's wife is hot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,746
|
Rabbit has made a good list. There was a time, when the real great singles players also played doubles, not for fun, but in earnest. So with all credit to the Woodies, i rank some of the older teams higher on pure class of the individual players. I once saw the Woodies getting really whipped by the German team of Stich (maybe the best doubles player of th 90s) and Kühnen in a deciding Davis Cup final. Newcombe and Roche in their primes were devastating, one had the best forehand volley, the other the best backhand volley. As a team Hewitt and McMillan were marvellous, Hewitt (a very decent singles player, maybe a bit slow) had a wonderful return, McMillan superb volleys with his doublehander. The oldtimers say, that Brugnon and Bromwich were the best doubles players, Brom won doubles over 20 years with Quist and young Sedgman. Sedgman himself won the only Grand Slam of doubles together with McGregor in 1951, and almost did it again in 1952.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,069
|
Isn't Mac still winning titles on the ATP tour every time he decides to grab a random partner like Bjorkman?
And Navratilova seems to be the female equivalent of Mac, winning multiple GS titles in her late 40s with different partners. It's too bad Mac and Martina are both ad-courters, or else they could have teamed up! Last edited by travlerajm : 02-14-2007 at 08:40 AM. |
|
|
|
| travlerajm |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by travlerajm |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The High Country of Colorado
Posts: 5,245
|
Great list:
Quote:
Gottfried / Ramirez Ashe / Okker McNair / Stewart - KK
__________________
Join PUT-OFF: Players Unwilling To Overlook Foot Faults .. .. .. .. .. The MAN -- Monster At Net .. .. .. .. .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 920
|
Quote:
Martina is the ultimate in doubles achivement and brilliance. She had over 30 womens doubles GS titles and at least 10 mixed GS titles as well. It is a shame she never teamed up with Mac, that is a partnership I would like have to seen. I do not see the big deal about the Bryans. They can't dominate an old Bjorkman and a relativly unacomplished Myrni (who himself is unlikely to leave great legacy). Comparing them to The Woodies is plain absurd. I feel Mahesh Bhupathi does deserve a mention for his contribution to mens's doubes and particularly mixed doubles. He also has led an interest for tennis in India that may be pivital in the future of the games's success. |
|
|
|
|
| noeledmonds |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by noeledmonds |
|
|
#33 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2004
Location: newport beach, california
Posts: 1,397
|
i will never vote for the bryan brothers, no two men, much less brothers, should be bumping uglies on the tennis court...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,495
|
The greatest doubles partnership of all time is John mcEnroe and anyone- Peter Fleming.
|
|
|
|
| The Gorilla |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The Gorilla |
|
|
#35 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,069
|
Quote:
It sems to me that any time either of these two decides to grab a new partner, a grand slam title results. 1992 was a great example. Mac grabbed Stich, and Navratilova grabbed Stark, and both won Wimbledon. |
|
|
|
|
| travlerajm |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by travlerajm |
|
|
#36 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: AR
Posts: 2,342
|
Would be tough to leave off Bhupathi/Paes they were solid for the time they spent as a team.
I would think The Woodies, then Mac/???, Grabb/Reneberg, then Bryan's |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in your nightmares
Posts: 113
|
Paes Bhupathi are the best of all time
|
|
|
|
| BlankenshipBabaganoosh |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BlankenshipBabaganoosh |
|
|
#38 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 322
|
johnny mac in his heyday with anyone else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,003
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,361
|
You guys are way off... best doubles team? Hands down:
Ana Ivanovic & Maria Kirilenko |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|