|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 522
|
He wasnt bad at all at the baseline. If he grew as a baseliner, I think he woulda been better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,842
|
i doubt it. that huge frame of his was meant for serve and volley play. towering serve and huge reach is a perfect fit for that style of play. if he would have been taught as a baseliner he would probably look like a bit more old school version of monfils with his extreme eastern forehand and eastern backhand. lanky frames like those just aren't meant for baseline play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,164
|
Let's speculate speculate speculate.
Would Agassi have been a better S&Ver? Would Sampras have been better staying back 10 feet behind the baseline? Would McEnroe have been better if he was right handed? Would Federer have been better if he used Babolat? Would Connors have been better if he used an RDS 001 MP with lead take on 10 and 2? Yea. |
|
|
|
| ATXtennisaddict |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by ATXtennisaddict |
|
|
#4 |
|
Gugafan_Redux
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Karlovic would be number one if he would just use a Western grip.
|
|
| Gugafan_Redux |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 920
|
Quote:
Totally off topic but I thought I would say it anway. Sampras was a baseliner who turned into a S&V and Federer was the other way round. I wonder if changing around this part of their game during their professional careers is what allowed them both to have such complete games. |
|
|
|
|
| noeledmonds |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by noeledmonds |
|
|
#6 |
|
Rookie
|
No, he wouldn't have been.
His height is great for the net and he doesn't have the smoothest groundies. And his volleys are fantastic.
__________________
Yonex RDS 001 mid |
|
|
|
| Tennis_Gnat |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Tennis_Gnat |
|
|
#7 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 643
|
Can we get a hells no. How about question "If Mirnyi didn't have his big serve, how much would he suck?"
|
|
|
|
| HollerOne5 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by HollerOne5 |
|
|
#8 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 121
|
no way with that wingspan, he is maximizing his potential with his choice of game.
|
|
|
|
| Budgerigar |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Budgerigar |
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
|
I couldnt imagine Max as a baseliner it would be weird, his serve volley game suits him well....hope he dosnt do a Henman and try to be a baseliner when he gets old...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Actually he's not bad at all from the baseline, IMO. In his match at Wimbledon last year, he outhit Blake quite a few times from the baseline. I think he has a nice forehand, and a very good slice. I wouldnt be surprised to see him make the QF at SW19 next year.
__________________
I wish there were more men like Atticus Finch around. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,394
|
who said he can't play well at the baseline?
then what about Ljubicic who also has a large frame? |
|
|
|
| tennis_hand |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tennis_hand |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 120
|
Erm, i think Marta Safin might take issue with that
It really depends upon mentality, imo... If Max adopted a style that was not 'his own', he would most likely have been less successful. You have to play to your own strengths, and be true to your own game. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| christopher07 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by christopher07 |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|