|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
G.O.A.T.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,087
|
Quote:
If someone is asked to win on Court One, they ought to get to play with someone who can carry their weight (assuming such a player is available). If the strong player gets the partner she thinks she needs, then I needn't worry about her griping to me should she lose. This may reflect my own bias/experience in that it rarely works to pair a weak and strong player. The match becomes keep-away. Neither the strong nor weak player can play her best, what with the strong player trying too hard and the weak player deferring too much. Feeding two weak players to the wolves on Court Three can yield some amazing upsets, when the two weak players realize they will have to get the job done all by themselves.
__________________
-- Random Error Generator, Version 4.0 -- Master Moonballer |
|
|
|
|
| Cindysphinx |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Cindysphinx |
|
|
#22 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 927
|
Well, being a "strong" player that was partnered with a "weak" player on Sunday, I'd still disagree. We played on the 2nd line against a relatively weak team. I can't fault my captain for using this match as an opportunity to get my partner some playing time as well as a chance to win.
I took it as a challenge - especially when my partner cramped up at the end of the 2nd set. I don't have much use for prima donnas that only want the best partners. |
|
|
|
| kylebarendrick |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by kylebarendrick |
|
|
#23 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 401
|
Quote:
Like Cindy, I often pair myself with the player the other teammembers don't want to play with, who often is the weaker player. I do it because I feel the team is better served by me playing with said player(s) than someone else playing with him or her. I do it because I'm willing to "take one for the team". It's not all selflessness. There are plenty of other teams out there and I constantly see other clubs trying to recruit my best players. If they're unhappy with being paired up with a weak player then they're more likely to join the other club. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 252
|
These have been some good stories. Interesting to see the same issues crop up in so many diverse situations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 737
|
Quote:
Isn't calling a captain a "cherry-picker" making a subjective decision? So it's not OK for the captain to make subjective decisions but it is OK for the players to do so? Hmmh. The captain may be the most versatile doubles player on the team and is what you call the "cherry" but no matter what she does or who she partners with, some of the players will grumble that she's cherry-picking. Maybe these players who left teams and accused the captain of cherry-picking are the weak players on the team who the captain played herself with because no one else would play with them. Every situation is different, I'm sure. But a team captain has to make decisions. That's part of the job. And making everyone on the team happy isn't always possible. Last edited by catfish : 04-15-2008 at 11:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|