|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 90
|
Question:
I swear by tournagrip (normal) in using it solely for gripping my racquets, however I want to know if it is recommended for me to change to the High Tak version? Can anyone who has changed or knows enough about the two please advise me on the better alternative prior to me buying anything? Tournagrip especially when worn can be quite slippery if unchange and therefore I would like to know if this would make a difference (even though I dont care how often I have to change the grip). Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,089
|
Hi-Tack is a very tacky grip at first, but the tack wears out fast. When you use Hi-Tack when it is not tacky, it does NOT feel like Tournagrip. Tourna stays dry(obviously) at first and dies dry. Worn Hi-Tack feels like a worn out tacky grip. It absorbs really well like Tourna. IMO, I prefer this over original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 90
|
Thanks for the reply!
Im wondering if there is anyone else out there who prefers to use High-Tak over the Original? Just trying to getting a third opinion if possible? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|