|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Bionic Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 36,513
|
No, those were PS 6.0 85's painted to look like HPS 6.0 95 Tours. The PS 6.0 85 also has a 16x18 string pattern.
__________________
"You CANNOT be serious!!" |
|
|
|
| BreakPoint |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BreakPoint |
|
|
#22 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,673
|
Why did the PS 6.0 switch to "6.1" when the design pretty much stayed the same? ie. Why isn't it K-Factor 6.0 Tour 90?
__________________
Custom weighted Babolat AeroPro Drive 2013 |
|
|
|
| kimbahpnam |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by kimbahpnam |
|
|
#23 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 17
|
nice racquets
__________________
www.FunnyTennisStories.com |
|
|
|
| fab_ireland |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by fab_ireland |
|
|
#24 |
|
Bionic Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 36,513
|
That's the $64,000 Question. My guess is that when they introduced the nCodes, Wilson changed from a numerical nomenclature to an alphabetical one, so "6.1" became "Six-One". If they stayed with the same "SI" rating for the Tour 90, it would have become the "Six-Zero", and perhaps they didn't want to have the name "Zero" associated with their flagship racquet, thus, they changed it also to "Six-One". Of course, it makes almost no sense to anyone to call both the 95 and the Tour 90 both "Six-One" because they are completely different racquets. And just to add to the confusion, they even gave both of the the same paintjob. How annoying is that?
__________________
"You CANNOT be serious!!" |
|
|
|
| BreakPoint |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BreakPoint |
|
|
#25 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,612
|
|
|
|
|
| leonidas1982 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by leonidas1982 |
|
|
#28 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
Couple of questions if you don't mind: Your racquets appear to be player made but not player used, is that correct? What are you doing with that collection. It look squite extensive. Do you exhibit it? Do use any of the racquets? are you planning on selling it? Did you buy the racquets or where they given to you by the players or their agents, or the manufacturer directly? Last edited by Racquet Man : 10-09-2008 at 05:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Racquet Man |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Racquet Man |
|
|
#29 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
Couple of questions if you don't mind: Your racquets appear to be player made but not player used, is that correct? What are you doing with that collection. It look squite extensive. Do you exhibit it? Do use any of the racquets? are you planning on selling it? Did you buy the racquets or where they given to you by the players or their agents , or the manufacturer directly? |
|
|
|
|
| Racquet Man |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Racquet Man |
|
|
#30 |
|
New User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 72
|
You could sell those bad boys for a lot of money...
__________________
Dunlop Aerogel 100, Aero Pro Drive Cortex, Npro Open X |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Professional
|
any news on the sampras racket ejiquet?
|
|
|
|
| m1stuhxsp4rk5 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by m1stuhxsp4rk5 |
|
|
#32 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
I don't play with my collections because they were specifically customized for particular pros and they aren't suitable for my playing style. Also, I have my own favorable rackets what have been using for over decade. I don't have intention to sell my collections away yet but I may consider to share some duplications to someone who are interested. But it should be very difficult to estimate the market value for those rackets as you can imagine that they didn't come with price tags and it is not a good idea for selling those historical rackets as commercial objective. Would you advise any suggestion for sharing those rackets to somebody? Last edited by Equijet : 10-14-2008 at 12:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Equijet, please drop me a mail (click on the Yahoo icon), i need to ask you something...
__________________
Sports do not build character. They reveal it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 113
|
Just checked the P1 homepage. Go to www.p1tennis.com and the to contacts.
Here you could see the new SAMPRAS racquet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 578
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 710
|
__________________
K Six One Tour 90 Unique Tourna Big Hitter 17/Gosen OG Sheep Micro Super 17 @ 53/57lbs. |
|
|
|
| Robbie_1988 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Robbie_1988 |
|
|
#38 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,612
|
|
|
|
|
| leonidas1982 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by leonidas1982 |
|
|
#39 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 710
|
I wonder if it plays anything like the PS 6.0 85
__________________
K Six One Tour 90 Unique Tourna Big Hitter 17/Gosen OG Sheep Micro Super 17 @ 53/57lbs. |
|
|
|
| Robbie_1988 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Robbie_1988 |
|
|
#40 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,612
|
|
|
|
|
| leonidas1982 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by leonidas1982 |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|