|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 218
|
I know people who "sqeak" their shoes when returning because they are getting ready to return and splitting before the return to get ready... As far as I'm concerned that should be legal...
__________________
Head MicroGel Prestige Pro w/ Luxilon Big Banger ALU Power Rough 16L @ 56lbs Gamma Progression ST II |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
woodrow1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
99% of the time it is legal. That's why it is very rarely called, and even less frequently before the non squeaker complains.
|
|
| woodrow1029 |
|
|
#23 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,893
|
Quote:
But as long as people think that somehow you cant call hindrance in an unofficiated match because you can. (you are supposed to warn them first however) Some situations are obvious. Like my opponent who is yelling out things when the ball is going out. Again all that matter is that he "choose" to do something that he clearly should have control over. Squeeky shoes may not be obvious because people play all the time with squeeky shoes. Even if someone is doing it in such a way that it's on purpose (making them squeek, not just to distract you), it would be hard to prove it.
__________________
BLX ProOpen - M:Pacific Classic Gut 17g #60 X:Isospeed Pro Classic #63 Volkl SuperGrip II Overgrip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,893
|
Can you share with us where you "looked it up"? We want to learn too!
__________________
BLX ProOpen - M:Pacific Classic Gut 17g #60 X:Isospeed Pro Classic #63 Volkl SuperGrip II Overgrip |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
woodrow1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
| woodrow1029 |
|
|
#26 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 1,215
|
Split stepping is only the instance of a single squeak which I'm not referring to. I'm talking about someone shuffling their feet multiple times (back and forth usually) while a person is somewhere in the process of serving prior to striking the ball. Capriati did this years ago and I've seen the occasional junior player do it once they realize that it can be annoying. If your shoes squeak when your recovery after a shot, there's nothing wrong with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,648
|
Sometimes...the shoes are just squeaky. And when a person moves, the shoes squeak. Asking the person not to move in a tennis match is...well, kinda unrealistic.
And some courts tend to be 'squeakier' than others as well, for instance, I played on a really slick indoor court this weekend, and I was squeaking like you wouldn't believe (my shoes are also worn down). Absolutely none of it was really under my control and none of it was 'intended'...but I'm not going to *not* prepare for the ball just because I think my shoes might distract my opponents. I believe someone else also said it...if that bothers a person, they have much bigger focus problems that they need to fix. I think you'd always have a hard time trying to prove 'intent' if you think someone is doing it deliberately while you're serving as well. Some people split-step, and some people move their feet more than that while getting ready to receive the ball. In my opinion, it is just too minor of an area to get too worked up about. *shrug* Your mileage may vary...
__________________
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
Out side of that, it would be pretty hard to call anyone on that sort of thing during a point since it may be hard to distinguish choppy footwork with intentional noise-making.
__________________
Ludacris: My chick bad! Tell me if you seen her. She always brings the racket like Venus and Serena! |
|
|
|
|
| JRstriker12 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by JRstriker12 |
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 2,511
|
I was called on it once by an umpire. I had to remove my shoes and play a point to prove that it was actually my feet squeaking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,648
|
What??? He had you play without your shoes on? Wow...though, you do seem to draw the ire of umpires!
__________________
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kona, Hawaii
Posts: 1,560
|
My shoes squeak all the time. I actually like hearing them.
If I don't hear them, I know I'm not moving my feet enough .. taking smaller steps vs. big steps. I don't intentionally do it or to distract myself or anyone though. But it is a good on-court tool/reminder for me. It's "da shoes". Also, I believe I've read it on tennis mag from contributing instructors that hearing one's steps to ensures good footwork. Now if I know my opponent doesn't do it normally while receiving but is purposely doing it to distract me, then that is entirely different. r, eagle
__________________
Alternatives to COME ON: Don't TAZE me Bro! ... DYNOMITE! ... I'm gonna shove this ball down your throat! Last edited by eagle : 11-17-2008 at 06:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,994
|
It's in the Code. #34 I think under "Movement/noise intentionally done to distract" or something similar. I also appreciate you editing my posts. Very nice!
__________________
Redondo MP / BB 11 / Yonex RDS 001 MP Last edited by rasajadad : 11-17-2008 at 06:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
woodrow1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Where does this translate to being a fact that it's a code violation? 34. Body movement. A player may feint with the body while the ball is in play. A player may change position at any time, including while the server is tossing the ball. Any other movement or any sound that is made solely to distract an opponent, including, but not limited to, waving the arms or racket or stamping the feet, is not allowed. |
|
|
| woodrow1029 |
|
|
#34 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 2,511
|
Quote:
I get on fine with umpires apart from the racquet between legs code violation! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,994
|
Quote:
I believe this is what covers it: any sound that is made solely to distract an opponent, including, but not limited to, waving the arms or racket or stamping the feet, is not allowed
__________________
Redondo MP / BB 11 / Yonex RDS 001 MP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 6,648
|
Ha! My bad...but you never can be sure with you Moz...I wouldn't put it past you to throw your shoes at an ump and play barefoot!!!
__________________
What would you do if you knew you could not fail? |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
woodrow1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
If it's DELIBERATELY DONE TO DISTRACT, then it is a hindrance and loss of point, but not a code violation. |
|
|
| woodrow1029 |
|
|
#38 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,994
|
I think you're splitting hairs here, (or maybe I don't understand your question,) but the OP asked if sqeaking your shoes is allowed. I'm saying according to The Code - no, it's not.
__________________
Redondo MP / BB 11 / Yonex RDS 001 MP |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Banned
|
Oh geeeeeeez, if it really bothers you THAT MUCH...
Why not... grunt like a caveman?? That should balance things nicely.. |
|
|
|
| HyperHorse |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by HyperHorse |
|
|
#40 | |
|
woodrow1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
And it's not splitting hairs. There is a big difference between a hindrance loss of point and a code violation. |
|
|
| woodrow1029 |
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|