|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#821 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,976
|
I'll assemble a crack team called Twaron's 11.
__________________
APDGT+, TB18 @ 48lbs, cheating with the 2012 PDR+ |
|
|
|
|
|
#822 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#823 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
|
So I ended up getting the PT 630s I asked about earlier -- they are a pair, they look to be matched. I purchased them from one of the local club pros, but he never used them, bought them off of ****. He was a satellite pro and used PC600s, then got sponsored by Babolat when he became a club pro, and for whatever reason did not renew and decided to go back to Head rackets even without a sponsorship. He's looking for PC600s but is in the meantime using the Microgel Prestige Pro.
The PT630s: There is lead underneath the CAP grommets, which are new, at 12 O'Clock. The butt cap on each is the black head butt cap but has 4 numbers stamped into it as well. The seller said he's seen this before, where they lead up at 12 and counterweight in the handle to increase the static weight but keep the headlightness. When crudely balanced against a Fisher M Pro NT (pencil at the throat), they end up around the same place, the racket handles tilting downwards at around roughly 45 degrees. They were unstrung and about 8/10 condition, cosmetic wear but very little frame wear. The grip pallet is not the standard rectangular grip that head rackets come with -- it feels like a Wilson or Prince grip pallet. I strung one up with NXT at 55lbs, then took it out on the ball machine and compared it to my standard Pure Storm Tour, which has lead and 3 and 9 and weighs in at around 12.2 oz., and the Fischer M Pro NT which weighs in at less than 12, I think. The PT630 was the most muted, and the Fischer the "crispest." It was a little wet, so I set up the machine for 4 bh, 4 fh, at three different power levels: standard, hard, and setup shots. The PT630 was the best at attacking the setup shots, but it really requires time to set up. The PT630 felt great, crushes the ball, but I'm guessing it weighs in at over 13oz., maybe even 14oz. I can't wield this thing for three sets. I'm guessing stock form -- 12.2 oz., would actually be better for me. I can weigh it at my local shop, and if I want them to remove the customization it will cost me about $20. The customization is definitely professional. I'm guessing balance is the same as stock and static weight is what changed. Am I committing a big no-no remove the customization? My big concern would be that I'm tampering with a "pro" customized racket, since there is a 4 digit serial number stamped into the Head butt cap. I'd rather just trade these for stock 280/630s and give someone else the opportunity to play with them if I can't handle the professional customization. I will probably give these a few more tries in matchplay before making a final decision. Any advice would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
#824 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,742
|
have you seen the austrian jails? they're 5-star hotels!
http://ahboon.net/2007/04/05/a-5-sta...on-in-austria/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#825 |
|
Professional
|
the pt280 serves some bombs. this is without the cap grommets. im curious if you guys recommend it with the caps because if feels a little unstable on groundies. what strings and tension would you guys recommend?
|
|
|
|
| m1stuhxsp4rk5 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by m1stuhxsp4rk5 |
|
|
#826 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,742
|
Quote:
as for adding caps to the 280, i'd suggest adding lead if you really think it's unstable before adding caps. if you're used to hitting with stiffer frames, the 280 may feel unstable b/c of the flexy nature of the frame. imo, i'd give it time to get used to hitting groundstrokes with it before adding lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#827 |
|
Professional
|
before i got to the pt280 i was using the head prestige classic 600. ill probably hit with it some more to see if i get used to it. would you recommend gut with poly hybrid or poly synthetic?
|
|
|
|
| m1stuhxsp4rk5 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by m1stuhxsp4rk5 |
|
|
#828 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,742
|
I'm currently using the PC600 as well. My preference is for gut hybrids but I lean toward using soft strings in general. I still use the gut/isospeed combination and right now I'm trying to snap the gut/syngut in my other PC600s because I don't like cutting strings during the off-season (waste of money).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#829 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Quote:
Nice photo VS. I got to know three high profile Austrian connection citizens that will help me around when I go to Austria in summer of 09. I will pay homage to this plant and the old one, you never know they might have few PT630's laying around. |
|
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#830 | ||
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Just an update and a heads up for the club
My PSK88 will be here this week and I will do a review comparing it to our beloved PT630. Drak has reviewed the PSK88 and has played with a PT630 said that it reminded him of the PT630 in terms of balance, plow thru and that solid thumping feel only a little firmer. http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=236348 this is what Drak did not like about the PT630 which BTW was a made in Austria on the side which had a bit higher SW, Quote:
Quote:
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=236348 With the PSK88 Drak though that the serve could have been better, which IMO could be the overall SW. Like I said. We need to lower the SW of the PSK88 and try to redistribute the balance to match a low swinging PT630. This will be a challenge for my review Taking off bumper from the PSK88 installing a very thin string at high tension, replacing with synthetic grip and warping the difference in lead around the butcap will reduce SW by more than 15 points at least. Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 12-24-2008 at 06:36 AM. |
||
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#831 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by vsbabolat : 01-14-2009 at 10:58 AM. Reason: To add a water mark to the scan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#832 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
^^^ this is kennelbach
could it be the CZ plant? or the new plant in the photo before |
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#833 |
|
Talk Tennis Guru
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FT. Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 23,911
|
vsbabolat>>> you are definitely the effen man!!! Thanks for sharing that with us. I've always wanted to see a step-by -step process from beginning to end of how a frame is produced.
Pro Tour 630, thanks for your post regarding our discussion related to the pt630/kps88. I look forward to reaading your thoughts. one question>>> you state you will be removing the bumer guard on the kps88??? what will you be using from grommets?? Thanks.
__________________
Head Stringer @ the LTC, Babolat Star 4 Stringer http://www.youtube.com/user/drakulie |
|
|
|
|
|
#834 |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
|
That is supposed to be Kennelbach. It is definitely Austria.
Last edited by vsbabolat : 12-24-2008 at 07:55 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#835 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#836 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,430
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#837 | |
|
Hall Of Fame
|
Quote:
I'm guessing it's just a tiny bit lighter than a PT630 but feels very similar...maybe just as buttery? If that's the case, then I think I'm set until I finally get my hands on the prettier blue pt630.
__________________
#1 Agassi Fan; K6.1 95 team, TwinTube Radical MP Videos: www.youtube.com/hyogen82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#838 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,319
|
Nice, thanks for sharing. For whatever reason, I always thought the process is more automated than that. Well, no wonder the racquet costs over $100
__________________
"An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today." – Laurence J. Peter |
|
|
|
| Lendl and Federer Fan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Lendl and Federer Fan |
|
|
#839 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 5,097
|
Quote:
look at how i lowered the sw of the k90 to 305 LOL, the same can be done to the psK88 http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=123179 Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 12-30-2008 at 09:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Pro_Tour_630 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630 |
|
|
#840 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 840
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|