Reed: True number one Murray will win US Open

[flyinghippos101]

Can you say...SUPER LAWL

[IvanAndreevich]

Originally Posted by Sentinel

A lot of experts here did think Murray would win. So u can't blame someone who merely earns his bread writing articles on tennis.

But aside from that, he actually says Federer was HANDED his Wimbledon and FO titles. LMAO?

[Sentinel]

Originally Posted by joeri888

It's just a bad article

My remark wasn;t aimed at you, and it was a sarcastic one anyway.

I read it a while back, can't recall there were some awful articles linked here, like the Bodo ones.

[Sentinel]

Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich

But aside from that, he actually says Federer was HANDED his Wimbledon and FO titles. LMAO?

OMG, a lot of folks on this forum would agree.

I guess everyone in the history of sport was handed his titles because some contender or other must have been injured, sick, tired or on the other side of the draw. Anyway, its sad to see that people writing articles too (not just posters here) are more fans of a player, than fans of the sport.

[CaptainInsano]

Originally Posted by timeisonmyside

The real #1 is the player who has the most points at the moment, and that's Federer.

Says it all.

The fact that Roger also won at least one Slam EVERY FREAKIN YEAR is not even part of the equation.

[taballi]

im just tired of how murray is the favorite to win every slam now... i mean honestly how many times does he have to underperform to convince the oddsmakers that he isnt a shoe in................

[P_Agony]

Originally Posted by JennyS

If Fed was handed Wimbledon, he did so by beating the player who beat Murray!

And the same goes for Roland Garros with Nadal, Fed beat the guy who beat Nadal.

[slicefox]

i love when threads like this are bumped to make fun of BS predictions