• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Stats for 1999 FO Final (Graf-Hingis)
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2009, 01:35 PM   #1
Moose Malloy
Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,464
Default Stats for 1999 FO Final (Graf-Hingis)

Graf d Hingis 4-6, 7-5, 6-2

my stats:

Hingis had 31 winners: 13 fh, 11 bh, 4 fhv, 2 bhv, 1 ov

Graf had 29: 16 fh, 10 bh, 2 fhv, 1 ov

Hingis had no aces, 1 double
Graf had 1 ace, 5 doubles

Hingis served at 63%(64 of 102)

She won 37 of 64 points on 1st serve(58%) & 14 of 38 on 2nd(37%)

Graf served at 56%(54 of 97)

She won 36 of 54 points on 1st serve(67%) & 19 of 43 on 2nd serve(44%)

Graf was 8 of 13 on break points(she broke in 8 of the 9 games she had a break point in)

Hingis was 6 of 14(she broke in 6 of the 8 games she had break point in)

Hingis was called for 2 foot faults, Graf one.

these were some stats from NBC:

after 1 set, Hingis had 13 winners, 9 unforced
Graf had 15 winners, 21 unforced

at 3-3 in the 2nd, Hingis was 14 of 25 at net, Graf 11 of 17
Moose Malloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Moose Malloy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Moose Malloy
Old 10-26-2009, 08:13 PM   #2
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

How many underhanded serves did each hit per set? LOL
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 10-26-2009, 08:19 PM   #3
grafselesfan
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,594
Default

It is amazing to see Hingis with 13 forehand winners and Graf with 10 backhand winners.
grafselesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
grafselesfan
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by grafselesfan
Old 10-27-2009, 08:28 AM   #4
Moose Malloy
Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,464
Default

Quote:
It is amazing to see Hingis with 13 forehand winners and Graf with 10 backhand winners.
Pretty much all of Graf's bh winners were either passing shots or drop shots. I don't think I've ever seen her hit more drop shots.

As to Hingis, her stats in this match surprised me. Maybe she had more power off the ground than she is given credit for(or maybe Graf's power is a bit overrated, esp in the context of the late 90s generation)
Moose Malloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Moose Malloy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Moose Malloy
Old 10-27-2009, 11:09 AM   #5
Joe Pike
Banned
 
Joe Pike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose Malloy View Post
Graf d Hingis 4-6, 7-5, 6-2

my stats:

Hingis had 31 winners: 13 fh, 11 bh, 4 fhv, 2 bhv, 1 ov

Graf had 29: 16 fh, 10 bh, 2 fhv, 1 ov

Hingis had no aces, 1 double
Graf had 1 ace, 5 doubles

Hingis served at 63%(64 of 102)

She won 37 of 64 points on 1st serve(58%) & 14 of 38 on 2nd(37%)

Graf served at 56%(54 of 97)

She won 36 of 54 points on 1st serve(67%) & 19 of 43 on 2nd serve(44%)

Graf was 8 of 13 on break points(she broke in 8 of the 9 games she had a break point in)

Hingis was 6 of 14(she broke in 6 of the 8 games she had break point in)

Hingis was called for 2 foot faults, Graf one.

these were some stats from NBC:

after 1 set, Hingis had 13 winners, 9 unforced
Graf had 15 winners, 21 unforced

at 3-3 in the 2nd, Hingis was 14 of 25 at net, Graf 11 of 17



Graf made 107 points, Hingis 93.
Joe Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Joe Pike
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Joe Pike
Old 10-27-2009, 01:50 PM   #6
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Pike View Post
Graf made 107 points, Hingis 93.
From Moose's numbers I get 106-93.
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Old 10-27-2009, 01:56 PM   #7
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,643
Default

Here's a boxscore from CNNSi.com (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/ten...05/hingis_graf)

Match Statistics
Statistics of Steffi Graf's, 4-6, 7-5, 6-2 win over Martina Hingis
Hingis Category Graf
64 First serve percentage 57
0 Aces 1
2 Double faults 5
32 Winners 46
43 Unforced errors 42
6/14 Break points won/total 7/12
Match duration: 2 hours 25 minutes
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Old 10-27-2009, 02:07 PM   #8
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,643
Default

One thing I notice about the boxscore is that the break points can't be right. The score was 4-6, 7-5, 6-2, so Graf must have made two more breaks than Hingis, as she does in Moose's numbers. In the boxscore she leads by only one break.
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Old 10-27-2009, 02:50 PM   #9
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose Malloy View Post
As to Hingis, her stats in this match surprised me. Maybe she had more power off the ground than she is given credit for(or maybe Graf's power is a bit overrated, esp in the context of the late 90s generation)
I think, though, that Graf hit a lot of forcing shots that were not clean winners. And in the boxscore she's got a very large windfall of winners beyond the clean winners/aces you gave her: 16 altogether. Hingis has only 1 extra winner.

Some of that could be judgment calls made on Graf's serves (service winners), but on clay Graf always forced errors mostly with her forehand.

Last edited by krosero : 10-27-2009 at 02:57 PM.
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Old 10-27-2009, 04:29 PM   #10
Moose Malloy
Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,464
Default

I counted 11 unreturned serves for Hingis, 8 for Graf. None that I judged as service winners,

Pretty surprised that box score would give Graf that many more winners, because my winner counts for the 1st set lined up exactly with NBC's. Wonder if they used a different source for their counts.

Last edited by Moose Malloy : 10-30-2009 at 08:52 AM.
Moose Malloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Moose Malloy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Moose Malloy
Old 02-19-2010, 10:40 PM   #11
Joe Pike
Banned
 
Joe Pike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krosero View Post
From Moose's numbers I get 106-93.
Plus one penalty point against Hingis.
Joe Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Joe Pike
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Joe Pike
Old 02-20-2010, 05:04 AM   #12
Warriorroger
Hall Of Fame
 
Warriorroger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moose Malloy View Post
Pretty much all of Graf's bh winners were either passing shots or drop shots. I don't think I've ever seen her hit more drop shots.

As to Hingis, her stats in this match surprised me. Maybe she had more power off the ground than she is given credit for(or maybe Graf's power is a bit overrated, esp in the context of the late 90s generation)
I don't think her power is overrated, have many of her tapes and have all of the rackets she played with and to produce those serves and forehands in the 88/93 period with the Dunlop Max 200G is amazing. That was such a non-flexible racket. Her power is a different one than the power generated through the rackets.
__________________
One thing they ([B]Roger Federer & Steffi Graf[/B]) have in common: they scare(d) the crap out of their opponents when at the top. that's the kind of weapon you can't teach at the local club. and they use(d) it to perfection.
Warriorroger is offline   Reply With Quote
Warriorroger
View Public Profile
Visit Warriorroger's homepage!
Find More Posts by Warriorroger
Old 02-20-2010, 10:11 AM   #13
krosero
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Pike View Post
Plus one penalty point against Hingis.
Yes, that would explain it; I'd forgotten the penalty point.
krosero is offline   Reply With Quote
krosero
View Public Profile
Visit krosero's homepage!
Find More Posts by krosero
Old 02-20-2010, 10:28 AM   #14
davey25
Banned
 
davey25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,063
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warriorroger View Post
I don't think her power is overrated, have many of her tapes and have all of the rackets she played with and to produce those serves and forehands in the 88/93 period with the Dunlop Max 200G is amazing. That was such a non-flexible racket. Her power is a different one than the power generated through the rackets.
Her power is overrated in the sense that her power all comes from the serve and the forehand. There are others like the Williams, Davenport, Seles, who produce that kind of extreme power from the serve, forehand, backhand, and return of serve.
davey25 is offline   Reply With Quote
davey25
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by davey25
Old 02-20-2010, 10:40 AM   #15
Texastennis
Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 112
Default

Too much narrow emphasis on "power." Graf's slice backhand penetrated very well and did far more damage than many "big power" backhands.
Texastennis is offline   Reply With Quote
Texastennis
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Texastennis
Old 02-21-2010, 02:07 PM   #16
Joe Pike
Banned
 
Joe Pike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davey25 View Post
Her power is overrated in the sense that her power all comes from the serve and the forehand. There are others like the Williams, Davenport, Seles, who produce that kind of extreme power from the serve, forehand, backhand, and return of serve.

But why then did Graf hit more winners than the Davenports and Seleses all the time?
Joe Pike is offline   Reply With Quote
Joe Pike
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Joe Pike
Old 02-25-2010, 11:40 PM   #17
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

I have this one on DVD. I have never seen Hingis in such a bizarre mood as she was during this match, from the walking to the other side, to the snarky attitude and temper, to the alternating bouts of fake indifference and desperation. Gotta wonder if she was on something.
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 02-26-2010, 01:54 AM   #18
fedhingis515
Semi-Pro
 
fedhingis515's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 685
Default

This match breaks my heart...
fedhingis515 is offline   Reply With Quote
fedhingis515
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by fedhingis515
Old 02-26-2010, 06:21 AM   #19
BTURNER
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: OREGON
Posts: 2,349
Default

Tactically is was the worst match I saw her play. She was hitting droppers from behind the baseline vs the fastest woman on the tour. I think she won one point off that tactic. Idiocy.
BTURNER is offline   Reply With Quote
BTURNER
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BTURNER
Old 02-26-2010, 11:08 AM   #20
Moose Malloy
Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,464
Default

Quote:
But why then did Graf hit more winners than the Davenports and Seleses all the time?
do you have any stats on this? not saying you're wrong, but Graf did hit less winners than very young Venus & Serena in their meetings 1999. I wonder about the '99 W Final(Davenport-Graf)
Moose Malloy is offline   Reply With Quote
Moose Malloy
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Moose Malloy
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Competitive Tennis Talk > Former Pro Player Talk
Reload this Page Stats for 1999 FO Final (Graf-Hingis)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse