• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page YouTek Prestige MP Pics
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 4 of 7 « First < 23 4 56 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2009, 06:34 PM   #61
mawashi
Hall Of Fame
 
mawashi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: S.E.A.
Posts: 2,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahile02 View Post
he's joking
Woah, don't you know we love to pull each other's leg?

Next time I'll use smilies to avoid confusion to others .

mawashi
mawashi is offline   Reply With Quote
mawashi
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by mawashi
Old 11-05-2009, 07:34 PM   #62
Shaolin
Hall Of Fame
 
Shaolin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kamchatka Peninsula
Posts: 2,632
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lawnmower View Post
What is the grip shape?


He already said it didnt have the grip pallet on it yet.
Shaolin is offline   Reply With Quote
Shaolin
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Shaolin
Old 11-05-2009, 07:42 PM   #63
star 5 15
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 758
Default

I love it how everyone wants specs and is judging the beam width and mold and all this frame is is a pj. hhahah. guys look at the paint. it doesn't even have a handle yet. its just a hairpin.
__________________
(1) Head PT10, 338g 314SW - (8)Babolat PSL GT, 332g 280SW (spec unstrung)
Babolat Star 5 - Luxilon Alu Power - Frames customized by Priority One
star 5 15 is offline   Reply With Quote
star 5 15
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by star 5 15
Old 11-05-2009, 08:04 PM   #64
stormholloway
Legend
 
stormholloway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces09 View Post
Best prestige paintjob I've seen so far, I really like the youtek look with the blood red of the prestige. Very sexy combination. I hate the way the radical's look with that orange, it just doesn't look good with the youtek design imo. I'm definitely getting the YT mid, stringing it up with some VS gut as soon as it comes out and slapping a leather grip and a Wilson pro overgrip on that bad boy.

Gorgeous racquet, thanks SO much for the pics! Really appreciate it.
My sentiments exactly. I'll buy one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawashi View Post
You do know that I'm joking right, it's a pro stock n completely different than what we can get anyway.

mawashi
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahile02 View Post
he's joking
Oh. Tough to know around here. There are some eclectic racquet dweebs around here.
stormholloway is offline   Reply With Quote
stormholloway
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by stormholloway
Old 11-05-2009, 10:46 PM   #65
Topspinchris
New User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 50
Send a message via MSN to Topspinchris
Default

I saw that in person here at the US ClayCourt Championships in Houston. It looked like a Prestige Pro he was using.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lacoster View Post
Tommy switched at the beginning of the clay season, but he actually still played with a Dunlop stencil on his Microgel Prestige (see link):

http://cache3.asset-cache.net/xc/880...1E70F2B3269972
Topspinchris is offline   Reply With Quote
Topspinchris
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Topspinchris
Old 11-06-2009, 12:24 PM   #66
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
Second picture in the OP clearly reads TGKxxx.1 (I believe it is the 238.1, but I am not sure about the numbers -- TGK for sure!).

That is not the PT630 mold, period.

I also saw Haas MG Prestige MP last week at Bosworth -- TGK238.1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
It is a completely different mold.
The head is smaller, the head shape is wider on the PT57, the balance is different, the feel is MUCH softer on the PT57 (not necessarily flexier) than the TGK.
These are completely different rackets
I find it hard to believe that the size of the head is that noticable. caps/grommets are the same

they are the same mold IMO

PT57A mold= MGPMP =TGK238.1 mold, different layup sound feel balance weight etc... but the same mold
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Old 11-06-2009, 03:16 PM   #67
ahile02
Rookie
 
ahile02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stormholloway View Post
My sentiments exactly. I'll buy one.





Oh. Tough to know around here. There are some eclectic racquet dweebs around here.
I definetely agree with you on that.
__________________
Jan: I underestimated you, Michael.
Michael Scott: Yeah, well maybe next time you'll estimate me. -The Office
ahile02 is offline   Reply With Quote
ahile02
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ahile02
Old 11-06-2009, 06:22 PM   #68
dr325i
Professional
 
dr325i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro_Tour_630 View Post
I find it hard to believe that the size of the head is that noticable. caps/grommets are the same

they are the same mold IMO

PT57A mold= MGPMP =TGK238.1 mold, different layup sound feel balance weight etc... but the same mold
WOW, this is a COMPLETE BS...sorry to say it this way but I thought you had clue about these sticks...

The PT57E and MGPMP/TGK238.1 have absolutely nothing in common -- completely different mold.

1) The frame thickness (looking straight at the stringbed) is clearly thicker with the PT vs. the MGPMP
2) THe string spacing is clearly different
3) the head size/shape is clearly different

And then the weight/balance/flex...

Check your facts before posting a claim -- DEFINITELY not the same mold...

I currently have the PT57A MGPMP PJ, and have had numerous TGK238.1 and retail MG...
__________________
4.5; 4x Head PT57A (MG PJ), Genesis Spin-X @ 54 lbs and Gamma Professional @ 57 lbs.

Last edited by dr325i : 11-06-2009 at 06:24 PM.
dr325i is offline   Reply With Quote
dr325i
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dr325i
Old 11-06-2009, 06:42 PM   #69
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
WOW, this is a COMPLETE BS...sorry to say it this way but I thought you had clue about these sticks...

The PT57E and MGPMP/TGK238.1 have absolutely nothing in common -- completely different mold.

Yes you are right the PT57E has nothing to do with the the TGK238.1. but were are talking about the PT57A, when you figure that out get back to us.......dweeb

1) The frame thickness (looking straight at the stringbed) is clearly thicker with the PT vs. the MGPMP

Could it be the thickness in paint?????
2) THe string spacing is clearly different

provide proof, why do the CAPS match if spacing are different. and please do not tell me the TGK238.2 is 16X19, it is irelivant and not the point of the topic
3) the head size/shape is clearly different

another conjecture and illusion, maybe you should look at them unstrung

And then the weight/balance/flex...

Irelivant and none starter to mold in question, like I said before they all weight balance and flex differently, what is the point? we are talking about the mold not the layup or feel, get it?

Check your facts before posting a claim -- DEFINITELY not the same mold...

Check your facts, I am posting an opinion just like yours, none of this is %100 fact unless your Tommy Hass himself

I currently have the PT57A MGPMP PJ, and have had numerous TGK238.1 and retail MG...
Uhmm nope, the head size/shape is not different, they are all the same

Notice you did not answer Kumat main question in this thread,is it because you do not know FOR SURE
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showt...light=tgk238.1
Quote:
Originally Posted by kumat63 View Post
I would be curious since you've been able to look at the PT57a, PT57e, and TGK238.1 side by side if they are three different molds, or if the TGK238.1 looks to be the same mold as the PT57a or PT57e... Thanks for the info!


nada............. you never said the PT57A and the TGK238.1 are different molds in this thread, not a pip squeek



I think you should stick to the Bimmer forum Dr325i, you were only introduced to these frames less than six months ago, you are a debutant.
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.

Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 11-06-2009 at 08:11 PM.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Old 11-07-2009, 05:01 AM   #70
dr325i
Professional
 
dr325i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro_Tour_630 View Post
Uhmm nope, the head size/shape is not different, they are all the same

Notice you did not answer Kumat main question in this thread,is it because you do not know FOR SURE
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showt...light=tgk238.1


nada............. you never said the PT57A and the TGK238.1 are different molds in this thread, not a pip squeek



I think you should stick to the Bimmer forum Dr325i, you were only introduced to these frames less than six months ago, you are a debutant.
I may have typed the E, I meant PT57A.

Stop crying like a little girl and accept the fact that you have no idea what you're talking about (in this case).

PT57A is the PT630 mold that has nothing to do with the MGPMP.

Second, I played with the PT57E a year ago, with the MGPMP/TGK after that and started with the PT57As some months ago. I used the PT630 before you were born...

As for answering the other's person's question...did not even see it...

Bottom line -- the PT57A and MGPMP/TGK238.1 are different molds...similar though...

PS. Can you clarify your TGK238.2 question please?
__________________
4.5; 4x Head PT57A (MG PJ), Genesis Spin-X @ 54 lbs and Gamma Professional @ 57 lbs.

Last edited by dr325i : 11-07-2009 at 05:08 AM.
dr325i is offline   Reply With Quote
dr325i
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dr325i
Old 11-07-2009, 05:02 AM   #71
jchl97
New User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Default Way better...

These prestiges are very nice, and liked their Youtek paintjob design. Way better than the MG version. Struggling with the Wilson BLX and the Youteks about which are better. Any more pics clearer? Thx!
jchl97 is offline   Reply With Quote
jchl97
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jchl97
Old 11-07-2009, 05:07 AM   #72
dr325i
Professional
 
dr325i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jchl97 View Post
These prestiges are very nice, and liked their Youtek paintjob design. Way better than the MG version. Struggling with the Wilson BLX and the Youteks about which are better. Any more pics clearer? Thx!
THe rackets are completely different... I don't think the PJ will swing buyers either way. For me, I am really disappointed with the Wilson PJ...
__________________
4.5; 4x Head PT57A (MG PJ), Genesis Spin-X @ 54 lbs and Gamma Professional @ 57 lbs.
dr325i is offline   Reply With Quote
dr325i
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dr325i
Old 11-07-2009, 07:43 AM   #73
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post

PT57A is the PT630 mold that has nothing to do with the MGPMP

Second, I played with the PT57E a year ago, with the MGPMP/TGK after that and started with the PT57As some months ago. I used the PT630 before you were born...

You were introdced to these frames less than six months ago, don't let me dig up your old posts

As for answering the other's person's question...did not even see it...

how conveniant! the main question and topic of the thread which you did not answer, strange

Bottom line -- the PT57A and MGPMP/TGK238.1 are different molds...similar though...

the first underline above you said the molds have nothing do with one another, now you are saying they are similar, what next
they are more similar than you think, differnet layup feel weight balance sound etc... etc...

PS. Can you clarify your TGK238.2 question please?
it was in reference to your silly string spacing question,

If the spacing were that different, can you use a PT57A CAPS on a TGK238.1 ? please say yes or no, not maybe. they either easily fit or do not fit. If the head size is different then the CAPS will not fit as well. Please answer these questions and I will admit my mistake, fair........
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.

Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 11-07-2009 at 07:51 AM.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Old 11-07-2009, 08:01 AM   #74
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
It is a completely different mold,
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
The head is smaller, the head shape is wider on the PT57, the balance is different, the feel is MUCH softer on the PT57 (not necessarily flexier) than the TGK.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
The TGK238.1 is Made in
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
China, has NOTHING to do with the PT57x mold.


in both of your posts you say the molds have nothing to do with one another and now you are saying they are similar though? I don’t get it?
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.

Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 11-07-2009 at 08:03 AM.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Old 11-07-2009, 08:24 AM   #75
PED
Hall Of Fame
 
PED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,991
Default

Michael, off topic but when are you getting your YT Prestiges demos? I'm looking forward to your reviews. You were spot on last time around re the MG series. I ended up using and loving the Pro.
__________________
YT Radical Pro X2: PL2 58/56
Prince Poly3D 55/53
PED is offline   Reply With Quote
PED
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by PED
Old 11-07-2009, 09:05 AM   #76
dr325i
Professional
 
dr325i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro_Tour_630 View Post
it was in reference to your silly string spacing question,

If the spacing were that different, can you use a PT57A CAPS on a TGK238.1 ? please say yes or no, not maybe. they either easily fit or do not fit. If the head size is different then the CAPS will not fit as well. Please answer these questions and I will admit my mistake, fair........
Sorry, missed that one again...
YES, you can fit the CAP on both. The spacing difference is minor (a few mm) but there is difference. I know it as I compared the two (laid them on top of each other), I used the TW SW calculator where you measure the distances tot he top string and noticed the differences, I felt more spin access witht he PT than TGK.

To your next question -- yes, they are VERY similar molds, almost identical, very small differences, but DEFINITELY different. The thickness is the major one, and the head shape. The PT (both BRAND NEW, unstrung) has a tad wider head and DEFINTELY shorter (from bridge up to the top), no doubt about that.

You mentioned the paint thickness which could be a possibility, but I doubt as it would have to be a 2mm paint on the PT, no chance. and I scratched them both to the graphite level and there is nothing special about the PT57A paint. WHy would they do SUPER thick paint anyway...

It is very much obvious in the throat area, and a piece of throat just above the top of the grip...

Finally, the area on both sides, just above the bridge, where the hoop starts, is another obvious difference -- on the PT57A it sticks out more, where on the MGPMP gets more elongated, smoother hoop shape, not sure how to explain that...

It is very possible that it is derived from the identical mold and the Retail version is (intentionally or not) "adjusted" a little bit, but they are definitely not the same.
__________________
4.5; 4x Head PT57A (MG PJ), Genesis Spin-X @ 54 lbs and Gamma Professional @ 57 lbs.
dr325i is offline   Reply With Quote
dr325i
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dr325i
Old 11-07-2009, 09:38 AM   #77
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

^^^ thanks Dr325i for your response, we are getting closer, you see that was not so bad,

I will answer in detail later when I have enough time

but as far as your major concern it is not 2mm difference in thickness, possibly less than 1mm difference and that could be paint I will elaborate later on my findings
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Old 11-07-2009, 10:58 AM   #78
dr325i
Professional
 
dr325i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 1,143
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro_Tour_630 View Post
^^^ thanks Dr325i for your response, we are getting closer, you see that was not so bad,

I will answer in detail later when I have enough time

but as far as your major concern it is not 2mm difference in thickness, possibly less than 1mm difference and that could be paint I will elaborate later on my findings
GO ahead...

There are a few things obvious (and this is the last reply from me on the topic):
1) thickness -- more than 2mm thicker.
2) Head shape, definitely different shapes
3) flat part above the grip top thickness
4) string spacing
5) some say shaft shape also, but I don't have the TGKs any more to compare...
__________________
4.5; 4x Head PT57A (MG PJ), Genesis Spin-X @ 54 lbs and Gamma Professional @ 57 lbs.
dr325i is offline   Reply With Quote
dr325i
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by dr325i
Old 11-07-2009, 01:41 PM   #79
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
GO ahead...

There are a few things obvious (and this is the last reply from me on the topic):
1) thickness -- more than 2mm thicker.
2) Head shape, definitely different shapes
3) flat part above the grip top thickness
4) string spacing
5) some say shaft shape also, but I don't have the TGKs any more to compare...
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=162292

I did measurments before on the MGprestigeMP vs the PT630 and since you agree that the TGK238.1 is IDENTICAL in mold to the MGpretige MP it is a good substitute.

the difference is less than .5mm, you can not tell the difference with the naked eye, you need a digital macrometer which you did not have. Trust me less than .5mm in thickness is very easy to do with one simple paint stroke. the PT57A are around 20mm, are you telling me the TGK238.1 is more than 22mm thick? come on Dr325i, In the begining I made the same mistake and thought they were different molds but they are much much closer than I originally thought,

the flat part above the grip is identical in length which makes this mold so unique. The area above the grip is noticably thinner on the PT57E's iprestige molds, the rest of your points are off.
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.

Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 11-07-2009 at 02:09 PM.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Old 11-07-2009, 01:55 PM   #80
Pro_Tour_630
Hall Of Fame
 
Pro_Tour_630's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,251
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
I used the PT630 before you were born...
In closing I would like to end with your history
Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
I have had (too) many sticks, but mainly for fun... My main sticks if I can recall:
1979-83: Spalding Woodie
1983-88: Wilson Aluminum old crappy Racket
1988-92: Dunlop MAX 200G
1992-93: Prince CTS DB24
1993-2007 -- NO TENNIS
2007 -- Wilson NBlade MP
2008 -- Wilson KBlade Tour/Head MG Prestige Pro/TF320/back to Wilson KBlade Tour
2009-Present: Head TGK238.1
when did you play the PT630 was that during your 15 year period break from tennis when the PT630 came out

I would like to invite you to our PT57A club if you like

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=167959
__________________
Spank those tree-hugging, environmentalist, conservationist hippies who are imposing their elite, hypocritical, liberal consumption habits and values.

Last edited by Pro_Tour_630 : 11-07-2009 at 02:04 PM.
Pro_Tour_630 is offline   Reply With Quote
Pro_Tour_630
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Pro_Tour_630
Reply
Page 4 of 7 « First < 23 4 56 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Racquets
Reload this Page YouTek Prestige MP Pics

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 PM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse