|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
New User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Nobody knows how the public option would play out, e.g., would it add genuine competition or put Aetna out of business? Remember: Reagan predicted the end of the world with Medicare. He thought it would lead to the death of the private sector -- or at least a huge section of it. He predicted a nightmare where doctors would be told where to live and elderly patients would be found dead in hospital lobbies. We've seen the opposite. The private sector got stronger and nobody wants their medicare to be taken away. Paying for it is the problem -- and Washington is too addicted to pork, corporate welfare, and misguided war to make room for the health of hard working Americans. I don't think insurance companies are evil. They are merely following the rules as they exist. The failure is one of political will, allowing for too much consolidation and legislative tinkering. The failure is bipartisan. Ultimately, the problem with this current bill is the problem with every bill: political machines with a direct financial stake in the outcome are feeding people who have not read the bill talking points. I doubt Reagan would have predicted that his party would some day be rallying medicare recipients to the GOP cause. I guess it's hard to know which slippery slopes are real and which are political theater. Again, you might be right, but you might be wrong. We don't know how the slope will slip. All we know is that SS and Medicare didn't turn us into the Soviet Union, as predicted. To the contrary, the private sector has continued to live like kings and gain power over our political machinery. [Can Pelosi fix any of this? I agree with you that this question is more like a punchline] Last edited by RD 7 : 11-08-2009 at 10:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Rookie
|
So far, the consensus seems to be that insurance companies love this bill. A mandate that forces people to get insurance, increases the number of potential customers to all of America. A massive increase in potential customers is a boon for Aetna, UnitedHealth, etc. even if their profit margins shrink.
Most of what I've seen in this bill drives down price of service rather than cost of service and there is a big difference between the two. Increasing the insurance pool will decrease costs of those who are already insured, at the expense of forcing people into the system (who were previously paying $0). This bill doesn't address the COSTS of service such as med school tuition, malpractice insurance, unnecessary testing, and highly specialized million-dollar equipment in the U.S. If the bill focused more on regulating these COSTS rather than the PRICE of medical care, free market competition amongst doctors and health care companies might actually work. Last edited by mlee2 : 11-09-2009 at 06:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 108
|
How are we going to pay for this bill? I love how Pelosi compared this bill to the signing of the great Medicare and SS bills. Those programs are doing well aren't they.
__________________
Head Microgel Prestige mid , Babolat Hurricane 18 guage, 58 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: no man's land
Posts: 559
|
just like serena said she was going to do!
__________________
2hbh Club Member #58 welcome to the ignore list, cindysphinx! |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: no man's land
Posts: 559
|
because they're run by the govt!
__________________
2hbh Club Member #58 welcome to the ignore list, cindysphinx! |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|