|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,285
|
By the way, the reason your spin has improved is because low tensions allow the strings to slingshot the ball, because the mains move more freely with polys at low tension. But the stiffness of the poly allows you to string lower than a synthetic gut and still maintain reasonable control.
I'd try stringing the mains four or five pounds higher than the crosses to see what happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 1,784
|
Very interesting and unique thread.
One important question for me: Is broken in string that was initially strung tighter, then played with for an extensive time (6 months) the same as initially string a racquet at low tension? I always figured that when I string at 54lbs I expect my strings to drop to 50lbs within a few hours. That is on my 16x19 pattern. But when I play with a 18x20 pattern, I string at the tension I want. I might try 40lbs but I can't see myself trying tension any lower. I am guessing that stringing at 30lbs goes by very quick. The tensioner must catch pretty quick and the clamps wouldn't have any draw back. |
|
|
|
| brownbearfalling |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by brownbearfalling |
|
|
#43 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,555
|
Today I hit my racquet at 10lbs. It was not as crazy as you'd imagine.
Here's the blog if you'd like to read all about it: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/?p=1160 Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/ Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 318
|
Great thread thanks for the updates.
__________________
Eastern FH, 1HBH, Dunlop Bio 400 Tour BHBR 17 39lbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 213
|
so 10lbs on a lock out is actually 8-9lbs on a constant pull correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Semi-Pro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 553
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Professional
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,341
|
This is downright fascinating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,555
|
Quote:
First few tiebreaks with the 20lbs set up was a little tough mentally and I had to keep telling myself to forget about the string and just play my game. Returning at 5-5 in a breaker, it was tough to trust the strings and just hit my shots, but I did it and it worked out great. Today, going to 10lbs was easier than going from 30lbs to 20lbs. The only issue I had at 10lbs was excessive vibration -- something I didn't have at 30lbs or 20lbs. As I mentioned in the blog, I'm going to play around between 25-35lbs to find the right tension for me. Volandri strings around 26lbs on the pro tour, so that might be my next test tension. Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/ Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 144
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 298
|
Awesome interesting stuff Chris. Would you say at lower tensions you had to remember to stay loose on your strokes more? I'd imagine trying to muscle the ball at that low of tensions would just send the ball flying.
Do you think you're going to permanently use really low tensions? I second what another poster said, a video of this would be really cool! Thanks alot Chris, keep up the good work!
__________________
Florida State University Class of 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Professional
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 972
|
My brain can't compute playing at these tensions, but it's fascinating. I'm too much of chicken to ever go below 50.
__________________
2 YouTek Prestige Pros (4 1/2); Sonic Pro 17 (52lbs). |
|
|
|
| supineAnimation |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by supineAnimation |
|
|
#53 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,069
|
I'm currently using 45/44 Kevlar/poly in my diablo mid, and it feels great. I've never gone lower though - I'd be interested to hear a comparison of Kevlar/ poly at superlow tension vs full poly or co-poly. I personally feel that a Kevlar/poly grips the ball with a lot more bite and control than a full poly or co-poly.
|
|
|
|
| travlerajm |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by travlerajm |
|
|
#54 | |
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,822
|
Quote:
As other have reported, it's soft and smooth, with good spin/control/oomph - and, yes, excellent comfort for a poly... okay, the tension obviously has to be considered here and in a big way. However, my instinct is this could well be precisely the poly I've been looking for. BTW my other Vantage is back from the stringers after the weekend (Poly. Energy @ 56 lbs), so I could answer your query better then. Sorry. Can't really answer your other qsn re comparing to soft multi/Maxim Touch. R. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,507
|
A great thread Chris - thanks. I've never been that adventurous with stringing so low, but after this thread I'm willing to try! And to top it all off -it's healthier for your arm; it's a win-win.
|
|
|
|
| nickarnold2000 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by nickarnold2000 |
|
|
#56 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,742
|
This is a fascinating thread that is about 10 years too late for me. My story is that growing up, I used a Pro Staff Classic 6.1 95 and I always thought that tighter was better...unfortunately I was stringing them at 65 lbs. with Forten Kevlar 15L. Unfortunately I ended up with arm problems that continue to this day. I remember at the time my dad saying I should string lower, say around 50, and thought he was nuts.
Now looking back, he wasn't that crazy after all. I'm currently using my PB10mid with MSV Hex 1.10 Black strung at 52 lbs. (Spring-Fall) and 50 lbs. (Winter). Here's the thing, using my ERT300 I found out my sweetspot ranges around the 40-44 lbs. range. I found this out just keeping track of tensions as soon as I get home along with how long I played and how many sets I played. Another crazy thing is that I can keep playing with the same strings until the bottom drops out to around 36-37 lbs. with no problem. I also don't break strings even though I hit with a good amount of spin since the strings don't really move all that much. What I really like about my setup is the slingshot effect, people have commented that I tend to hit heavier if I just whip the PB10. I also like the ease of playing defense; just stick the racquet out and the ball just goes. Playing offense definitely is a ton better too as I'm getting a ton of jump on my shots; being lefty and having the spinny setup is definitely a boon. Has my game changed from going to lower tensions? I think I try to exploit the setup now as it pertains to my game, with the PB10mid I can definitely hit some wicked angles and touch shots while also pounding big serves and groundies. Slightly OT, my trek-font PC600 was strung with VS17/Isospeed17 at 48/53 and it's still in the frame, but has dropped tension in the low 40s and I feel that although I'm not hitting the wicked angles, I can still reap the benefits of great defense and a more penetrating, flatter ball from the ground and serve. The lesson learned for me is that I should keep an open mind from now on and try something new every so often. Who knows, it could be a pleasant surprise! |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Professional
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
I read your blog where you mentioned "hand pulling" the tension, and since 10lbs worked for you I thought, heck I could hand pull at least 10lbs. So I tried it on an old racket which had no strings in it anyways. I had no machine btw, but still remember how to string from back in the days, so I used a soft face woodworking clamp and a pair of work glove. I was surprised I could get the main strings pretty tight feeling. Any loose strings could be tightened up by pulling on previously tensioned strings while pulling on the end of the string. But the cross strings I couldn't do that with so they feel pretty loose. It's kinda rough on the hands though. Anyway, it actually felt good so far bouncing the ball on the strings. Good call on the Barry White comment... My normal rackets suddenly sound tinny and feel board like right after boucing the ball on the hand pulled strings. I have no idea what the tension is obviously, I do know there is a drastic difference between the mains and the crosses. This is an old slightly fractured (it just makes slight sound) but still totally functional racket strung with super low priced Liberty 16 so it doesn't matter. I'll get to try it out in the afternoon. Btw, I tried pushing down on the middle of the string bed firmly with my thumb while holding the edge of the frame with my other fingers, and the stringbed caves in about 1/4 of an inch on a 90sq in head. Could you tell me how much the string bed deforms on any one of your string tensions? Just trying to get an idea of how firm my strings currently are. Thanks again for your experiment. |
|
|
|
|
| Hi I'm Ray |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Hi I'm Ray |
|
|
#58 |
|
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,712
|
if ultra low string tensions are so good, how come they haven't been used in the past?
|
|
|
|
| spacediver |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by spacediver |
|
|
#59 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,555
|
Quote:
It is amazing how quickly we adjust as players. After hitting with the 10lbs racquet, when I went to the 30lbs racquet it felt crisp in comparison. Imagine that, a racquet strung at 30lbs, feeling crisp! While it was obviously still very soft, compared to 10bs it was pretty crispy. We are shooting the Nike Vapor Lunarlite shoe review Monday, so I'll tack on some additional shooting to get footage of hitting with low tensions. Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/ Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,555
|
Quote:
Poly is stiff before you string it, while you string it and after you string it. Even just holding the string, so at 0lbs, it is stiff. Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/ YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/ Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|