• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Blog
  • Blogs
  • FAQ

Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Low, low tensions. 30lbs feels great. 20lbs pretty good, too
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 3 of 96 < 12 3 451353 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-26-2010, 02:47 PM   #41
Nanshiki
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,285
Default

By the way, the reason your spin has improved is because low tensions allow the strings to slingshot the ball, because the mains move more freely with polys at low tension. But the stiffness of the poly allows you to string lower than a synthetic gut and still maintain reasonable control.

I'd try stringing the mains four or five pounds higher than the crosses to see what happens.
Nanshiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Nanshiki
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Nanshiki
Old 03-26-2010, 03:03 PM   #42
brownbearfalling
Hall Of Fame
 
brownbearfalling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: WA
Posts: 1,784
Default

Very interesting and unique thread.

One important question for me: Is broken in string that was initially strung tighter, then played with for an extensive time (6 months) the same as initially string a racquet at low tension?

I always figured that when I string at 54lbs I expect my strings to drop to 50lbs within a few hours. That is on my 16x19 pattern. But when I play with a 18x20 pattern, I string at the tension I want. I might try 40lbs but I can't see myself trying tension any lower.

I am guessing that stringing at 30lbs goes by very quick. The tensioner must catch pretty quick and the clamps wouldn't have any draw back.
brownbearfalling is offline   Reply With Quote
brownbearfalling
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by brownbearfalling
Old 03-26-2010, 03:53 PM   #43
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,432
Default

Today I hit my racquet at 10lbs. It was not as crazy as you'd imagine.

Here's the blog if you'd like to read all about it:
http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/?p=1160

Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 03-26-2010, 05:14 PM   #44
W Cats
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 318
Default

Great thread thanks for the updates.
__________________
Eastern FH, 1HBH, Dunlop Bio 400 Tour BHBR 17 39lbs.
W Cats is offline   Reply With Quote
W Cats
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by W Cats
Old 03-26-2010, 05:33 PM   #45
hescobal
Rookie
 
hescobal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 213
Default

so 10lbs on a lock out is actually 8-9lbs on a constant pull correct?
hescobal is offline   Reply With Quote
hescobal
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by hescobal
Old 03-26-2010, 05:41 PM   #46
jk175d
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
Today I hit my racquet at 10lbs. It was not as crazy as you'd imagine.

Here's the blog if you'd like to read all about it:
http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/?p=1160

Chris, TW
very intriguing! My question to you Chris, do you get the feeling that the novelty of the low tensions might be influencing your feelings about it at this point and once that aspect wears off you might think differently? Can you simply break down the pro's and cons of 30lbs vs your tried and true set-up? Thanks for sharing.
jk175d is offline   Reply With Quote
jk175d
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by jk175d
Old 03-26-2010, 06:22 PM   #47
ttbrowne
Professional
 
ttbrowne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,341
Default

This is downright fascinating.
ttbrowne is offline   Reply With Quote
ttbrowne
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ttbrowne
Old 03-26-2010, 07:29 PM   #48
Toad
Rookie
 
Toad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hescobal View Post
so 10lbs on a lock out is actually 8-9lbs on a constant pull correct?
lol

I've been wanting to try this with a full bed of Kevlar for a while...this thread pushed me over the edge...I'm doing that test next. Full Kevlar @ 26 lbs. (half my normal Kevlar tension).
Toad is offline   Reply With Quote
Toad
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Toad
Old 03-26-2010, 08:29 PM   #49
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jk175d View Post
very intriguing! My question to you Chris, do you get the feeling that the novelty of the low tensions might be influencing your feelings about it at this point and once that aspect wears off you might think differently? Can you simply break down the pro's and cons of 30lbs vs your tried and true set-up? Thanks for sharing.
I've been playing points while hitting so the novelty of the low tensions quickly went away as I had to get down to business. At first, when I realized how much spin I could get, I was trying to put maximum spin on everything -- fine for hitting, but not getting it done during points. I realized this very early on, so just played normally from then on.

First few tiebreaks with the 20lbs set up was a little tough mentally and I had to keep telling myself to forget about the string and just play my game. Returning at 5-5 in a breaker, it was tough to trust the strings and just hit my shots, but I did it and it worked out great.

Today, going to 10lbs was easier than going from 30lbs to 20lbs. The only issue I had at 10lbs was excessive vibration -- something I didn't have at 30lbs or 20lbs.

As I mentioned in the blog, I'm going to play around between 25-35lbs to find the right tension for me. Volandri strings around 26lbs on the pro tour, so that might be my next test tension.

Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 03-26-2010, 08:47 PM   #50
Yaz
Rookie
 
Yaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
I've been playing points while hitting so the novelty of the low tensions quickly went away as I had to get down to business. At first, when I realized how much spin I could get, I was trying to put maximum spin on everything -- fine for hitting, but not getting it done during points. I realized this very early on, so just played normally from then on.

First few tiebreaks with the 20lbs set up was a little tough mentally and I had to keep telling myself to forget about the string and just play my game. Returning at 5-5 in a breaker, it was tough to trust the strings and just hit my shots, but I did it and it worked out great.

Today, going to 10lbs was easier than going from 30lbs to 20lbs. The only issue I had at 10lbs was excessive vibration -- something I didn't have at 30lbs or 20lbs.

As I mentioned in the blog, I'm going to play around between 25-35lbs to find the right tension for me. Volandri strings around 26lbs on the pro tour, so that might be my next test tension.

Chris, TW
Chris, how did you adjust to balls with no pace vs. lots of pace with the low tension? I had some trouble at both extremes when trying sub-50lbs.
Yaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Yaz
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Yaz
Old 03-26-2010, 08:51 PM   #51
ahile02
Rookie
 
ahile02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 298
Default

Awesome interesting stuff Chris. Would you say at lower tensions you had to remember to stay loose on your strokes more? I'd imagine trying to muscle the ball at that low of tensions would just send the ball flying.

Do you think you're going to permanently use really low tensions?

I second what another poster said, a video of this would be really cool!

Thanks alot Chris, keep up the good work!
__________________
Florida State University Class of 2014
ahile02 is offline   Reply With Quote
ahile02
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by ahile02
Old 03-26-2010, 08:58 PM   #52
supineAnimation
Professional
 
supineAnimation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 972
Default

My brain can't compute playing at these tensions, but it's fascinating. I'm too much of chicken to ever go below 50.
__________________
2 YouTek Prestige Pros (4 1/2); Sonic Pro 17 (52lbs).
supineAnimation is offline   Reply With Quote
supineAnimation
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by supineAnimation
Old 03-26-2010, 10:27 PM   #53
travlerajm
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,042
Default

I'm currently using 45/44 Kevlar/poly in my diablo mid, and it feels great. I've never gone lower though - I'd be interested to hear a comparison of Kevlar/ poly at superlow tension vs full poly or co-poly. I personally feel that a Kevlar/poly grips the ball with a lot more bite and control than a full poly or co-poly.
travlerajm is offline   Reply With Quote
travlerajm
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by travlerajm
Old 03-26-2010, 11:15 PM   #54
Ross K
Legend
 
Ross K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Standupnfall View Post
How would a Soft Poly such as Black Magic or PolyStar Energy at 40-50lbs compare to a Super Soft Multi like Maxim Touch at 55-58lbs in terms of arm-friendliness.
Or even a cheap first gen Poly at 40-50.

I did like Polystar at 50 and wondering how arm friendly this is compared to a much softer string at a standard mid tension like 55lbs.

Thanks
Well, I tried it yesterday in my Vantage @ 45 lbs. And while it was too low for my tastes (too springy/lively, although the kick on serve was just unbelievable!), my impression of the string was very positive indeed.

As other have reported, it's soft and smooth, with good spin/control/oomph - and, yes, excellent comfort for a poly... okay, the tension obviously has to be considered here and in a big way. However, my instinct is this could well be precisely the poly I've been looking for. BTW my other Vantage is back from the stringers after the weekend (Poly. Energy @ 56 lbs), so I could answer your query better then.

Sorry. Can't really answer your other qsn re comparing to soft multi/Maxim Touch.

R.
Ross K is offline   Reply With Quote
Ross K
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Ross K
Old 03-26-2010, 11:52 PM   #55
nickarnold2000
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,507
Default

A great thread Chris - thanks. I've never been that adventurous with stringing so low, but after this thread I'm willing to try! And to top it all off -it's healthier for your arm; it's a win-win.
nickarnold2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
nickarnold2000
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by nickarnold2000
Old 03-27-2010, 12:09 AM   #56
jayserinos99
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,742
Default

This is a fascinating thread that is about 10 years too late for me. My story is that growing up, I used a Pro Staff Classic 6.1 95 and I always thought that tighter was better...unfortunately I was stringing them at 65 lbs. with Forten Kevlar 15L. Unfortunately I ended up with arm problems that continue to this day. I remember at the time my dad saying I should string lower, say around 50, and thought he was nuts.

Now looking back, he wasn't that crazy after all. I'm currently using my PB10mid with MSV Hex 1.10 Black strung at 52 lbs. (Spring-Fall) and 50 lbs. (Winter). Here's the thing, using my ERT300 I found out my sweetspot ranges around the 40-44 lbs. range. I found this out just keeping track of tensions as soon as I get home along with how long I played and how many sets I played. Another crazy thing is that I can keep playing with the same strings until the bottom drops out to around 36-37 lbs. with no problem. I also don't break strings even though I hit with a good amount of spin since the strings don't really move all that much.

What I really like about my setup is the slingshot effect, people have commented that I tend to hit heavier if I just whip the PB10. I also like the ease of playing defense; just stick the racquet out and the ball just goes. Playing offense definitely is a ton better too as I'm getting a ton of jump on my shots; being lefty and having the spinny setup is definitely a boon.

Has my game changed from going to lower tensions? I think I try to exploit the setup now as it pertains to my game, with the PB10mid I can definitely hit some wicked angles and touch shots while also pounding big serves and groundies. Slightly OT, my trek-font PC600 was strung with VS17/Isospeed17 at 48/53 and it's still in the frame, but has dropped tension in the low 40s and I feel that although I'm not hitting the wicked angles, I can still reap the benefits of great defense and a more penetrating, flatter ball from the ground and serve.

The lesson learned for me is that I should keep an open mind from now on and try something new every so often. Who knows, it could be a pleasant surprise!
jayserinos99 is offline   Reply With Quote
jayserinos99
View Public Profile
Visit jayserinos99's homepage!
Find More Posts by jayserinos99
Old 03-27-2010, 04:57 AM   #57
Hi I'm Ray
Professional
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TW Staff View Post
I've been playing points while hitting so the novelty of the low tensions quickly went away as I had to get down to business. At first, when I realized how much spin I could get, I was trying to put maximum spin on everything -- fine for hitting, but not getting it done during points. I realized this very early on, so just played normally from then on.

First few tiebreaks with the 20lbs set up was a little tough mentally and I had to keep telling myself to forget about the string and just play my game. Returning at 5-5 in a breaker, it was tough to trust the strings and just hit my shots, but I did it and it worked out great.

Today, going to 10lbs was easier than going from 30lbs to 20lbs. The only issue I had at 10lbs was excessive vibration -- something I didn't have at 30lbs or 20lbs.

As I mentioned in the blog, I'm going to play around between 25-35lbs to find the right tension for me. Volandri strings around 26lbs on the pro tour, so that might be my next test tension.

Chris, TW
Hey Chris, thanks for keeping an open mind and trying out something that few would even think about. I'm currently in the mid to upper 40's for string tension but didn't think 30lbs would even return a ball - man was I wrong. I think this will help quite a few ppl out, you might even start a new trend.

I read your blog where you mentioned "hand pulling" the tension, and since 10lbs worked for you I thought, heck I could hand pull at least 10lbs. So I tried it on an old racket which had no strings in it anyways. I had no machine btw, but still remember how to string from back in the days, so I used a soft face woodworking clamp and a pair of work glove. I was surprised I could get the main strings pretty tight feeling. Any loose strings could be tightened up by pulling on previously tensioned strings while pulling on the end of the string. But the cross strings I couldn't do that with so they feel pretty loose. It's kinda rough on the hands though.

Anyway, it actually felt good so far bouncing the ball on the strings. Good call on the Barry White comment... My normal rackets suddenly sound tinny and feel board like right after boucing the ball on the hand pulled strings. I have no idea what the tension is obviously, I do know there is a drastic difference between the mains and the crosses. This is an old slightly fractured (it just makes slight sound) but still totally functional racket strung with super low priced Liberty 16 so it doesn't matter. I'll get to try it out in the afternoon.

Btw, I tried pushing down on the middle of the string bed firmly with my thumb while holding the edge of the frame with my other fingers, and the stringbed caves in about 1/4 of an inch on a 90sq in head. Could you tell me how much the string bed deforms on any one of your string tensions? Just trying to get an idea of how firm my strings currently are. Thanks again for your experiment.
Hi I'm Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Hi I'm Ray
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Hi I'm Ray
Old 03-27-2010, 10:31 AM   #58
spacediver
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 1,712
Default

if ultra low string tensions are so good, how come they haven't been used in the past?
spacediver is offline   Reply With Quote
spacediver
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by spacediver
Old 03-27-2010, 10:36 AM   #59
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ahile02 View Post
Awesome interesting stuff Chris. Would you say at lower tensions you had to remember to stay loose on your strokes more? I'd imagine trying to muscle the ball at that low of tensions would just send the ball flying.

Do you think you're going to permanently use really low tensions?

I second what another poster said, a video of this would be really cool!

Thanks alot Chris, keep up the good work!
I found if I just cleared my mind and played as usual, blocking out the low tension deal, worked best. It was tough at times to trust the racquet and stay on the gas during points, but it worked out.

It is amazing how quickly we adjust as players. After hitting with the 10lbs racquet, when I went to the 30lbs racquet it felt crisp in comparison. Imagine that, a racquet strung at 30lbs, feeling crisp! While it was obviously still very soft, compared to 10bs it was pretty crispy.

We are shooting the Nike Vapor Lunarlite shoe review Monday, so I'll tack on some additional shooting to get footage of hitting with low tensions.

Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Old 03-27-2010, 10:41 AM   #60
TW Staff
Administrator
 
TW Staff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tennis-Warehouse.com
Posts: 22,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacediver View Post
if ultra low string tensions are so good, how come they haven't been used in the past?
They were used in the past in wooden racquets. With graphite, I'm not sure how syn gut or natural gut would be at these low tensions. The use of poly as a string material definitely makes low tensions a realistic option.

Poly is stiff before you string it, while you string it and after you string it. Even just holding the string, so at 0lbs, it is stiff.

Chris, TW
__________________
LIKE us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/TennisWarehouse
TW Blog: http://blog.tenniswarehouse.com/
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/tenniswarehouse
Follow us on Pinterest: http://pinterest.com/tenniswarehouse/
Add us on Google+: www.google.com/+tenniswarehouse
TW Staff is offline   Reply With Quote
TW Staff
View Public Profile
Visit TW Staff's homepage!
Find More Posts by TW Staff
Reply
Page 3 of 96 < 12 3 451353 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Go Back   Talk Tennis > Tennis Equipment > Strings
Reload this Page Low, low tensions. 30lbs feels great. 20lbs pretty good, too

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Hybrid Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Talk Tennis :: Powered By Tennis Warehouse - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2006 - Tennis Warehouse